From China to Pakistan: A well-thought-out 3,000km lifeline

从中国到巴基斯坦:一条深思熟虑的3000公里的生命线
Pramit Pal Chaudhuri and Imtiaz Ahmad, Hindustan Times, Beijing/Delhi/Karachi| Updated: Aug 30, 2015 01:58 IST

Through September, working groups of Chinese and Pakistanis will finalise 40-plus projects to launch the $46 billion China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). Both governments see this as more than just a construction project. The corridor is designed to transform Pakistan’s economy—and potentially China’s global status.

Already in the Arabian Sea port of Gwadar, the southern terminus of the corridor, the Chinese have begun upgrading the harbour. So has the expansion of the highway out of the port, a road that will run 3000 kilometres to the Chinese border town of Kashgar.

Much of the corridor’s initial expenditure is on power plants. Nearly $34 billion of the corridor’s funds will go to energy projects, with over half of this going to electricity production. When completed, Pakistan’s national grid will receive 10,400 MW additional power.

Beijing’s logic is simple. As an ex-Chinese ambassador to Pakistan explained, “Solving Pakistan’s power deficit is the first step to stabilising its economy.” Pakistan struggles with rolling blackouts thanks to an annual power deficit of about 5,000 MW. The contracts also help Chinese makers of generators, solar cells and the like, all of which suffer from huge overcapacity and need overseas buyers. Pakistan’s Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, publicly says before his term ends in 2018, power cuts will be a thing of the past.

The CPEC agreement goes far beyond a port, highway and power plants. Gwadar will be all but rebuilt with a hospital, new drinking water supply and an international airport. The agreement spans Chinese biotech for cotton farmers to a multi-million dollar fibre optic network to slots on Pakistani Television for Chinese shows.

While the Karachi-to-Kashgar axis—Gwadar included—receives the most attention, it is only the easternmost of three corridors. Plans exist for central and western alignments—the latter running from Gwadar to Quetta and beyond.

Beijing has made the eastern alignment priority, postponing the central alignment that many Pakistanis prefer. China cites the July 2013 memorandum which says construction would “take the easiest [route] first”.

This has not gone down well with many provinces. Balochistan economic advisor, Kaiser Bengali, complained the present plan would not help economic activity in backward areas. Senator Taj Haider of the Pakistan People’s Party, noting wealthy Punjab would benefit the most, has promised his party would “protest” against “the choice of route” and “the placement of some of the projects”. Under pressure from the military, however, the provinces have grudgingly endorsed the corridor. Balochistan chief minister Abdul Malik Baloch, a strident critic, is among those who have backtracked recently.

China has security concerns about the two other alignments, fed by Pakistani fears that India would somehow sabotage the corridor’s construction.

Pakistani army chief, General Raheel Sharif, last month twice warned “enemies of the state” would try to stop the corridor.

Islamabad plans to train 12,000 security personnel to protect the coming hordes of Chinese workers. This will be in addition to the 8,000 security personnel already deployed to guard existing Chinese workers. Chinese media has already fretted about its workers being abducted. Reports say Chinese and Pakistani intelligence are sharing information on the anti-corridor activities of “foreign hostile agencies”—a reference to India’s Research and Analysis Wing.

Beijing’s heavy-handedness is because Chinese leader, Xi Jinping, wants CPEC to come up as fast as possible for prestige reasons.

His vision of an Asia-spanning infrastructure web with China at its centre—One Belt, One Road—has been less than popular with many countries. India Prime Minister Narendra Modi has pointedly refused to endorse the idea. Indian officials say this was in large part because CPEC, seen as part of One Belt, One Road, runs through Indian-claimed parts of Kashmir.

Says Andrew Small, author of The China-Pakistan Axis: “CPEC will be a test case for One Belt, One Road. It’s pretty much the most advanced set of projects within the whole initiative.” If China can transform a basket case like Pakistan, a place where the United States has spent billions in vain, Beijing’s standing in the developing world will be massively enhanced. As some diplomats have said, this could be Beijing’s “Marshall Fund moment”.

Another motive, not mentioned in public, is terror. Chinese academics and military officers admit the rise of Islamist militancy inside their country is “their number one security concern.” As the US leaves Afghanistan, China sees the corridor as a preventive against a coming jihadi epidemic.

As a senior US official said, “China follows a simple Marxist logic about this: low economic development means greater militancy.” The idea the corridor could save Pakistan, however, is also attractive to the Obama administration. Iran is sniffing at the possibility of linking itself to the corridor.

Though the CPEC has just started, Islamabad already benefits. Credit rating agency Moody’s, which puts Pakistan just two notches above default, declared the corridor a “credit positive”. This, despite the IMF slashing Pakistan’s forecasted 2015 growth rate to 2.6%. Beijing wants to turn this figure around quickly and has frontloaded $28 billion of its corridor expenditure.

Chinese officials say that as the corridor comes up, they hope to move factories to Pakistan. At present total Chinese FDI into Pakistan is less than $1 billion.

The strategic ambition behind the CPEC is sprawling. This is the largest foreign investment in Pakistan’s history and the largest overseas venture by China. Beijing’s commitment dwarfs the $1.5 billion a year Pakistan gets from the US.

Normally cautious when it ventures overseas, with this corridor China shows the confidence of a big-time gambler. The CPEC excites Beijing because it has so many pluses for Chinese strategy: stabilise an ally and jihadi source; create a market for Chinese capital goods; and offers a flagship project for Xi’s global plan.

1440931153482578.gif



源:http://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/from-china-to-pakistan-a-well-thought-out-3-000km-lifeline/article1-1385619.aspx

国外网友评论 0人跟帖    4706人参与

HKD

Its not so subtle attempt by China to surround India.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
SamDidymus

India will have to invest in more nuke submarines to offset the subs being sold to Pakistan by China in this deal, in order to maintain the ability to blockade Gwadar and Karachi. Indian naval ships must also establish a presence in the Strait of Malacca to deny Chinese a safe passage there.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Mr. Bernard Wijeyasingha

New Delhi ONLY allows China to invest in India. India makes sure that her neighbors are deprived of that "privilege".

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Tango Reply to Mr. Bernard Wijeyasingha

He Guy, why do you come to Indian websites if you have so much animosity with India. India alsways considers Srilanka to be a desh of demons and you are no exception.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Mr. Bernard Wijeyasingha Reply to Tango

You have not read all my comments Including the one that India has no memorial for world war 2. I also make good comments and many Indians are on Sri Lankan websites.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
veekay08 Reply to Mr. Bernard Wijeyasingha

Who told u India does not have memorial for WW-II? We have plethora of memorials of our brave sons who had sacrified their lives. But who are u to question? Get lost.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Mr. Bernard Wijeyasingha Reply to veekay08

Deccan Herald and please show me the memorial in New Delhi for I could not find it.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Tango

A prosperous Pakistan will not dare to poke India because stake will be high. I think this will be good. Also India will supersede China in next 10 years so we should not have any concern.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
MyTake

The way HT gives detail account of China Pak engagement totally opposite the way it gives any account of Modi's engagement with India! This explains where Most of the HT Think Tank's heart and their loyalty lies!

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Indian_Abroad Reply to MyTake

For Pseudo-seculars nationalism and national interests are nothing.
Fighting and bringing down the 'communal forces' is more important.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Rajesh Mehta Reply to Indian_Abroad

Extreme inequality is not the only cause of Maoism, but it is the main one - and it must be tackled if India wishes to defeat extreme Maoism.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Indian_Abroad Reply to Rajesh Mehta

Democracy is worst but nothing is better.
Embrace capitalism to reduce inequality and uplifting of socio-economic state of the country.
Socialism and Communism have failed around the World.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
NBM

Let's hope peace pervades after this huge investment. But I don't think it will be plain sailing for China and there could be big falling out.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Indian_Abroad

Neither China nor Pakistan is trustworthy. They know it and don't trust each other.
What did the West get after feeding Pak for decades?
What did India get after supporting China for permanent UN seat?

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
shrihari kulkarni Reply to Indian_Abroad

Don't bother china has more enemies than friends

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Indian_Abroad Reply to shrihari kulkarni

Agree. It has failed to win hearts as a potential superpower in waiting.
The World did not like the US until China's face was revealed.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Indian_Abroad

India has nothing much to lose. Prosperous neighbors are a good thing.
But India for its own development should move quick with Chabahar project for access to Central Asia.
The US, Russians, Arabs and Iranians will stand losers if Gwadar becomes a success.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
shrihari kulkarni Reply to Indian_Abroad

Can a port change the fortunes I don't know.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Indian_Abroad Reply to shrihari kulkarni

It certainly can for Pakistan if it handles the things correctly (which itself is doubtful to me).

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
shrihari kulkarni Reply to Indian_Abroad

How come.Did china US Germany Japan UK France prospered becoz of some port

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Indian_Abroad Reply to shrihari kulkarni

Don't compare apples to orange.
One Gwadar can go long way for where Pak economy is today.
And it is not only one port, they are talking improving road network and energy situation of Pak.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
shrihari kulkarni Reply to Indian_Abroad

I am not doing that.yes power situation might improve,but to be prosporus u need an inherent strength or advantgae.Does suez cannal has helped Egypt to become big economy ?

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Indian_Abroad Reply to shrihari kulkarni

You say you not comparing two incomparable and then go back to do the same. Egypt went against Israel and hence the then US.
To be prosperous you need correct mindset. That's why I said earlier that 'if Pak handles it right'

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
shrihari kulkarni Reply to Indian_Abroad

For correct handling they need to shun gazwa gangs like LeT,reduce radicalization built up thru false history teachings, become more modern ,invest in infra education and finally give up obsession from K word
but I doubt they will do any of these.
I can't compare Egypt to Pakistan
Why
Isreal Egypt r almost allies now
Even US Egypt relations r also good
What is stopping them

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Indian_Abroad Reply to shrihari kulkarni

While I agree with you on your first two para, (The correct mindset is needed in short) don't agree with you on your thinking or even facts on Egypt . We can go on and on. Easier would be for you to do some stand alone independent fact searching on Egypt.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
shrihari kulkarni Reply to Indian_Abroad

How they will be losers.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Indian_Abroad Reply to shrihari kulkarni

The article explains how China's standing will improve - that will certainly hurt the US and Russia. Also where Russians (former Soviets) failed the Chinese will succeed. Arab and Iranian ports will have a competition. Arabs ports will lose the lust. Chinese will be stone throw away from Iran controlling the sea in the name of safeguarding trades.
The US and Russia in addition to Iran won't like it.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
shrihari kulkarni Reply to Indian_Abroad

Sir US has dozens of bases in several nations
Russians r more connected to EU than Asia
Arabs damn care abt a port,does Pakistan has any oil
Dubai is rich becoz of oil
U know UAE has sovereign funds of more than 1 trillion dollars.
Why they care for some port

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Indian_Abroad Reply to shrihari kulkarni

One last time suggestion, please do some research and let's reconnect.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
shrihari kulkarni

Nothing sort of jealousy let Pakistan do well and become prosporus and lets hope won't forget 1965 lesson where in all prospirty lost for the sake of Kashmir

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
shrihari kulkarni

Why chinese did not helped Pakistan in 1965

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Indian_Abroad Reply to shrihari kulkarni

It didn't suit China then.
It may not suit China again if there is another Indian -Pak conflict.
It did not suit Pak to intervene in 1962. You could imagine what would have been India's situation had that happened.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
shrihari kulkarni Reply to Indian_Abroad

That does mean in case of future conflicts Pakistan cant count anybody even there ummah arabs

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
veekay08 Reply to Indian_Abroad

Pakistan "interfering" in 1962? did they have any capability and capacity? And what do u mean by, ""India's situation had that happened"? Did India lose to Chinese? Chinese realised that by coming from the heights they had tied them selves in the knots as their supply lines had extended beyond their manageable control. They retreated because the Indian army was regrouping and after the winters we would have taught them lessons of their life. So far India had not used it's air force, which was much superior to the chikies at that time. So, stop being a fool here.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Probhat Raha Reply to Indian_Abroad

Pakis interfering and helping Chinese in the eastern frontier is an absurdity. That's logistically impossible. Remember how Indian Army beat the crap out of Pakis in the Bangladesh liberation war. 90000 Paki Army personnel surrendered. If Indira Gandhi was a real political leader then Pakis would be history now.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Truely Speaking Reply to shrihari kulkarni

Like fekuu did not support chuchma in LaMo case !

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
CANDOR

So basically project is for power export to Pakistan and military access. Road movements are most expensive and never suit the business movements and ship routes are the cheapest. India concerns are there as projects is passing through the areas illegally captured by Pakistan and not got vacated by our first moron PM Nehru. India has to step in to get POK vacated and derail the project. Pakistan own enemies like Taliban will definitely target the project. Indians should start boycotting Chinese products and unless China loses on Indian side, project won't be derailed.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
KP Reply to CANDOR

At the end Chinese will have P0rkistan as its r@ndi!

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Dillip Patnaik

India's RAW should chart out clandestine operations in POK and Baluchistan to stop Chinese adventurism in Indian subcontinent by kidnapping the Chinese and setting up road side explosives. They have to recruit local dissidents in those territories to do the job.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
RealistSays

Indians (rightfully) need to sabotage at least the Eastern Alignment - Northern Corridor, which runs through Indian territory, though now under Pakistani occupation.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Aks Amu

This is not going to solve China's long term macro issues. As long as they continue to fudge their numbers, Keynesian economics can't help them.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
KP

A new international airport in Baluch, well thought investment, lol! Disturbed area wonder which airlines will dare to land at such an airport except P0rki Airlines where there ain't anyone to catch a flight. Already in Pakistan analysts are citing this deal with China is further going to put the state in debt as $47 billion investment is not an aid something P0rkis are used to rather a loan which they will not be able to pay back. At the end P0rkistan will be for sure China's r@ndi!

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Maratha warrior

China is charging 17% interest on this investment, Bakistan will not afford this.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Maniktripathy

Amazing foreign policy....South china sea, disputed and warns India to stop oil exploration....We literally stop...China building in "POK" , no response from India....Wonder if selfie paid off...

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Surinder Sharma

India will not lie low in the face of such uncalled for lethal threats to its safety security integrity.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
MyTake

China does not even tolerate nice and kind hearted Falon Gong members who are Chinese! Why it would tolerate Pak trouble makers? Most kindness it will show to Paki is make body parts (for reuse) out of Talibans!

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Kamran Yousaf

Pakistan is developing and also getting rid of from the virus of Terroism, which will leads to the stable Pakistan, Stable region and Stable World. Pakistan is a responsible state and want to resolve all issues including Kashmir with India through table talk. Pakistan is a small state as compared to India so it can never think about to attack India, which will be a suicide for Pakistan.
CPEC is a project which will led prosperity in Pakistan and connects this region to the other regions of the World. The main problem of this Region is the resolution of Kashmir region and if we thing with open mind no country will come back from its stance and remain keep fighting with each other. But is this the future of this region? we are both Nuke States and we can not afford war between us, which will ruin our even our children. Kashmiri's are the owner of their whole Kashmir and their stance must be included in the resolution. Once this issue get resolve then both countries can progress. Both countries have to show responsibility. You could ruin us with your force but we will also have nukes which could damage you for the rest of whole life, therefore, we have to show responsibility. We are taking strict actions against all Terrorists organizations, who ever found guilty, will be nab by our authorities.
We have problems of Terrorism, Poverty, illetracy, Energy and others and we see towards CPEC for our growth. This will certainly improve the health of Gilgit Baltistan, South Punjab and Balochistan regions, which are least progressed region of Pakistan. It is in the benefit or interest of Gilgit Baltistan which can control the whole CPEC as there is only way to China thourgh GB. We hope that countries of this region could support and help to uplift this region and China will never take over Pakistan, until this region supports Pakistan.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Tarun Durga Reply to Kamran Yousaf

Good luck in your effort .If you feel it will solve the basic problems of iliteracy fundamentalism and religious intolerance then we will support you.
But it seems you are giving wrong medicine for the disease

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]

评论

游客 请登录 注册