The 3.6 million-year-old footprints that reveal how our ancient male ancestors had more than one mate at a time

360万年前的脚印告诉你:我们祖先一夫多妻制
Shivali Best For Mailonline

13 footprints belonging to five Australopithecus afarensis were found[CN]

5个阿法南方古猿的13个脚印已经发现。

A male is thought to have walked at least 30 metres with four females[CN]

一男携着四妻走了至少30米以上。

Calculations of height suggest he was at least 20cm taller than the females[CN]

身高的计算得出,他至少比其他女人高20cm。

The prints suggest Australopithecus afarensis may have had a gorilla-like social arrangement with a dominant male who mated with several women
[CN]

这个脚印表明,阿法南方古猿人可能有着与猩猩相同的社会架构 – 一夫多妻。

3B5E1C2D00000578-4032084-image-a-2_1481707359365.jpg

Footprints belonging to a group of early humans who lived millions of years ago have been uncovered in Tanzania. A man, accompanied by four women was thought to have walked at least 30 metres over the volcanic ash that later hardened into rock[CN]

这些脚印是百万年前生活在这里的早期猿人群体留下的,在坦桑尼亚境内被发现。一男,携带4女,走了至少300米,经过火山灰,火山灰不久变成了石头。

3B5E1C1E00000578-4032084-image-a-6_1481708590312.jpg

The researchers believe that they belong to five members of Australopithecus afarensis – the prehuman species best known for the fossil skeleton, nicknamed 'Lucy'[CN]

研究者坚信这5人是阿法南方古猿人 – 以他们的化石骨架出名的类人猿,别号“露西”。

article-urn publicid ap.org 9f723c5e64d84ac5b685d2cbf523eec7-1zZ3EpUHK16cd13debeae5a7aa3-727_634x344.jpg

This illustration provided by Dawid A. Iurino in December 2016 shows a reconstruction of the northern Tanzanian Laetoli site 3.66 million years ago, where the footprints were found[CN]

Dawid A. Iurino 2016年12月给出的这些说明,重新定义了坦桑尼亚366万年前的利特里古遗址,这一切都基于脚印的发现。

3B5E1C0E00000578-4032084-image-a-7_1481708605803.jpg

Measurements of the length and width of the footprints, stride length and the angle of the gait allowed the researchers to calculate rough weights and heights for the five[CN]

通过测量脚印的长宽,步幅和步态,调查者计算除了这5个类人猿的大致体重和身高。

3B5E502E00000578-4032084-image-a-4_1481708535277.jpg

The prints were found at Laetoli – a site which is famous for another set of smaller footprints left by Australopithecus afarensis individuals[CN]

脚印是在利特里发现的 - 这个古遗址还有另一组阿法南方古猿的小脚印,同样享誉世界。

3B5EBC1100000578-4032084-image-m-19_1481712159415.jpg

3B5EBA6D00000578-4032084-image-a-20_1481712170334.jpg

In November, researchers analysed the fossilised arm bones of Lucy, an early hominin from the Australopithecus afarensis species, and suggested that she was a tree climber

article-urn publicid ap.org 9f723c5e64d84ac5b685d2cbf523eec7-3UAhTNFsAw9ae0c281e6beea956d-256_634x422.jpg

The 13 footprints were discovered in Laetoli, Tanzania, by an international group of researchers, led by Sapienza University in Rome

Footprints belonging to a group of early humans who lived 3.6 million years ago have been uncovered in Tanzania.

The early impressions were made when five of our ancient relatives - most likely Australopithecus afarensis - walked across wet volcanic ash.

Researchers say the footprints suggest that members of Australopithecus afarensis may have had a gorilla-like social arrangement of one dominant male mating with several females. 

The 13 footprints were discovered in Laetoli, Tanzania, by an international group of researchers, led by Sapienza University in Rome.

The researchers believe that they belong to five members of Australopithecus afarensis – the prehuman species best known for the fossil skeleton, nicknamed 'Lucy.'

A man, accompanied by four women was thought to have walked at least 30 metres over the volcanic ash that later hardened into rock.

Professor Giorgio Manzi, lead author of the study, said: 'This novel evidence, taken as a whole with the previous findings, portrays several early hominins moving as a group through the landscape following a volcanic eruption and subsequent rainfall. But there is more.

'The footprints of one of the new individuals are astonishingly larger than anyone else's in the group, suggesting that he was a large male member of the species.

'In fact, the 165cm stature indicated by his footprints makes him the largest Australopithecus specimen identified to date.'

The findings differ from previous studies that have suggested that Australopithecus afarensis males only had one sexual partner.

A study in 2003 by researchers from Penn State University performed extensive simulations using modern humans, chimpanzees, and gorillas to understand the sex lives of Australopithecus afarensis individuals.

In their paper, the researchers, led by Dr Philip Reno, wrote that 'the reproductive strategy of A afarensis was principally monogamy.'

The prints were found at Laetoli – a site which is famous for another set of smaller footprints left by Australopithecus afarensis individuals.

In the 1970s, those prints made headlines as the earliest clear evidence of upright walking by our ancestors.

The newly found prints are only 150 metres away.

Measurements of the length and width of the footprints, stride length and the angle of the gait allowed the researchers to calculate rough weights and heights for the five.

The male came in at the heaviest and tallest, weighing 48.1kg (100lbs) and measuring about 5 foot 5 (165cm), while the lightest only weighed 28.5kg.

If these measurements are correct, this would mean the male loomed more than 20 centimetres (eight inches) above his fellow walkers.

Dr Marco Cherin, who also worked on the study, said: 'A tentative conclusion is that the group consisted of one male, two or three females, and one or two juveniles, which leads us to believe that the male - and therefore other males in the species - had more than one female mate.'

The large male-female disparity suggests that Australopithecus afarensis may have had a gorilla-like social arrangement of one dominant male, with a group of females and their offspring. 

But not everyone is convinced by the researchers' analysis of the height.

Dr William Jungers, a research associate at the Association Vahatra in Madagascar who wrote a commentary on the study, says the estimate is suspect.

In his commentary, Dr Jungers wrote: 'It is important to note that foot length has only been roughly estimated for this ancient species, and that the height estimates would change if a different foot length-to-stature ratio was used.' 

In November, researchers analysed the fossilised arm bones of Lucy, an early hominin from the Australopithecus afarensis species, and suggested that she was a tree climber.

Scans of Lucy's arm bones revealed her upper limbs were somewhere between a modern human and a chimpanzee.

The evidence gleaned from the scans proves she spent time climbing and used her arms to pull herself up, potentially ending the long-running debate among palaeontologists.

It also expands on evidence from earlier this year which claimed that Lucy may have died from a fall, most likely from a tree.

Taken together, the evidence suggests that Australopithecus afarensis may have been spent time on the ground, returning to the safety of the trees for food and to sleep, to avoid predators. 

国外网友评论 0人跟帖    5220人参与

Operation Snowflake

Rubbish, more lies from the elite to discredit the Holy Bible. The earth is all but 8k years old if that. Jesus is the King of Kings and we will all bow to him soon, Christians out of servitude, the unsaved out of realisation.[CN]

垃圾文章!这些精英分子又来编造谎言荼毒圣经!如果这么说的话,地球也就8000年寿命而已。上帝是这个世界的万王之王,我们很快就会臣服于他的。基督徒将免于被奴役,未获救的人无法体会。

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Nikki25Reply toOperation Snowflake

U r an idiot I believe in God but I don't have a religion all gods books are man made to try rule people's lives mainly women it's pathetic all of them need burning because it wasn't made by any god[CN]

你这傻逼,我也信上帝但是我可不觉得所有上帝的书籍都是编造出来的,用来统治别人的生命的(主要是女人),真是可怜,这些人都要烧死,因为这些人不是上帝制造出来的。

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
WispaReply toOperation Snowflake

Amen. Operation Snowflake[CN]

阿门。 Operation Snowflake.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
To each their ownReply toOperation Snowflake

My goodness someone is of their medication , all bow to the amazing sky pixi , whatever one you follow that is , because if you follow one your condemned by the others .[CN]

我的天,还真有人落入这种俗套,相信这种天马行空的东西。无论你信哪一条都好,只要信了,其他人就会质疑你!

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
AmericaNeedsTrump

Complete and utter fantasy! The Bible shows us that the earth was created at most 5,000 years ago. What are these so-called scientists trying to hide?[CN]

完全就是扯淡!圣经有说,气球是5000年前创造出来的。这些所谓的“科学家”是想掩盖些什么?

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
afrissoreReply toAmericaNeedsTrump

baaahahahahahahahahaha keep on thinking that.[CN]

哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈,你继续!

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
John JohnsonReply toAmericaNeedsTrump

The Bible does NOT say the world is 5,000 years old. It is your interpretation of the Bible that claims that. Do you know the words metaphor or symbolism?[CN]

圣经可没这么说过啊。只是你这么理解圣经里边的内容罢了。难道你连比喻和象征都不懂?

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Catcats89Reply toAmericaNeedsTrump

You think science is fantasy but the Bible is truth?! Talk about backwards...[CN]

你觉得科学真是胡扯,圣经却是真理?现在到底谁落后了?

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
LenReply toAmericaNeedsTrump

The Bible doesn't say any such thing.[CN]

圣经可没提过这茬啊!

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
AmericaNeedsTrumpReply toAmericaNeedsTrump

Two more commenters going to Hell for their blasphemy. Good![CN]

这两个亵渎神灵的评论人就该打入十八层地狱!

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
JohnReply toAmericaNeedsTrump

Eta Carinae is a star visible to the naked eye that is 7500 light years away, was that star created before the Earth, if so thats a direct contradiction of the Genesis creation myth.[CN]

海山二星是距离7500光年肉眼可见的行星。如果那可行星是在地球之前就创造出来了,就直接和创世纪的理论相矛盾了。

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
AngiebabeReply toAmericaNeedsTrump

Religious wackos doing what they do best: making themselves appear stupid.[CN]

这些宗教狂热分子真是无所不用其极的证明自己很蠢啊。

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
stinkpipeReply toAmericaNeedsTrump

The Bible also tells us that the truly faithful can handle poisonous snakes and not be hurt by them. Off you go then.[CN]

圣经还告诉我们,真正的诚心可以对付得了毒蛇,不会为其咬伤。来啊,你去试试啊。

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
lightheartedwilliamReply toAmericaNeedsTrump

relieved to realise you're joking[CN]

发现你这话是在说笑,我就松了一口气。

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Calgacus99

3.6 million years? Archaeologists can't accurately date the ancient world of a few thousand ago but here they are telling us that these foot prints are 3.6 million years old.[CN]

360万年前?这些考古学家连几千年前的古老世界都无法追溯出来,现在你跟我说这些脚印是360万年前的???

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Ursus RexxReply toCalgacus99

Actually most radiocarbon / other sophisticated sample-/-time-dating is pretty accurate!Witness the discrediting of the shroud of Turin to within 50 years, (either way) , of 1350![CN]

实际上很多放射性碳/其他精细的抽样/日期的定年还是非常准确的!50年内见证都灵裹尸布,不管怎样,在1350都有存在过。

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
SusieReply toCalgacus99

I think you will find that the discrediting had later been discredited UrsusRexx. Tthere is still some doubt about its age, a case of no one yet knows.[CN]

相信呢,你发现的这些谬论可能以后证明是真理。所以诚然,这个时代还有很多未解之谜,很多还不能为人所理解。

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
vikersabbot

This lot must be from SCIENTISTS FOR EU they need more funding for stupid projects like this ,and why is one of the team tickling the foot print with his brush ?its been there millions of years he wouldn't hurt it with a yard brush ,talk about jobs for the boys . I wonder what this little caper cost us[CN]

我看这些东西就是欧盟那帮科学家搞出来的吧,他们需要资金来搞这种愚蠢的项目。为什么会有个队员拿着刷子去戳那个脚印遗迹呢?都上百年了,这样会毁了这个遗址的。这些是临时工吧。我真想知道搞这个东西又花了多少钱?

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
BasedinUK

The BS these people think up is amazing.[CN]

这些“砖家”想出的这些理论还真是神奇啊!

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
A Clockwork OrangeReply toBasedinUK

Yeah like the bible.[CN]

没错,跟圣经说的一样。

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
username

" Over the past 150 years, these archeologists and anthropologists have covered up as much evidence as they've dug up, literally. "[CN]

过去的150年,这些考古学家和人类学家掩盖的事实就跟他们发现的真相一样多啊,毫不夸张的说。

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Edward QuinnReply tousername

As an archaeologist, literally, I have no idea what you're on about, literally.[CN]

作为一个考古学家,恕我无法从文字上理解你这这句话,纯粹文字上的。

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
WispaReply tousername

Because Edward you are not in the Elite gang. You will be given your small patches to dig around in.[CN]

因为爱德华你不在这些精英分子阶层。他们给你三两片土地,你就开荒去吧。

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Be Aware

If libs want to go on insisting that they are descendants of apes, why argue? Didn't you watch the news on election night, and on city streets soon after? In the meantime, I'll go on believing 'we' were created by Him in His image.[CN]

如果这些家伙铁了心要坚持他们是猿猴的子孙,还争论它干嘛?胜选之夜你有看新闻吗?随后还在城市街头游行吗?再说了,我倒是愿意相信是他创造的,在他的想法中就是这样。

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Be AwareReply toBe Aware

BTW, some of you libs ought to visit your relatives in the zoos, and if you can't get them released on their own recognizance, at least tell them to catch up with the rest of you. Swinging on vines, how embarrassing...[CN]

顺便说句,如果你们这么坚持就该去拜访一下动物园里的亲戚啊,如果你得不到他们认可,至少告诉他们要赶上你们。在藤条上摇晃,真够丢人啊。

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Stop ScaremongeringReply toBe Aware

Jeez what is with you rightwing Yanks and the word lib, human beings evolved from apes because that is what the scientific evidence shows, just as it shows that all other species evolved. Politics has zero relevance at all, accepting the theory of evolution doesn't make me a lib anymore than accepting the theory of gravity does.[CN]

天啊,你们这帮右翼美国分子和全世界的愤青,人类从猿猴进化而来是有科学证据表明的。就好像其他物种的进化一样。政治从来就没有中肯之说,接受进化论我已不再是愤青,这跟相信重力理论没什么两样。

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
OnslosVestReply toBe Aware

We are descendants of a common ancestor to apes.[CN]

我们是猿猴祖先的子孙啊。

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Tuna SandwichReply toBe Aware

OnslosVest is not quite right - we are descendants of a common ancestor we share with THE OTHER apes. An ape is just a mammal that has (among other things) nipples, brachiating shoulder joints and no tail. So we can observe the fact that humans are apes at this very moment, and we can infer that at least one of the following statements is true: 1) Be Aware has no nipples. 2) Be Aware's shoulder joints do not rotate. 3) Be Aware has a tail. While I applaud his honesty and wish him well in his travails, I dare say the DM comments section is not the best place for this type of confession.[CN]

OnslosVest说的不对,我们拥有一个共同的祖先,跟其他猿人一样。猿仅是一种哺乳动物,跟其他物种相比有奶头的,有奶子,有可以相互交错的肩关节,没有尾巴。所以所以我们此时可以很认真的观察到猿猴。我们可以推断,至少有一个结论是正确的。1. 注意有没有奶头。2. 注意肩关节可不可以转动 3. 第三,有没有尾巴。我赞赏他的诚实和辛苦劳作,但是每日邮报不适合这种坦诚

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
DeplorableMeReply toBe Aware

Be Aware - COMMENT OF THE MONTH!! LOL[CN]

注意了 - 年度最佳评论!哈哈哈

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
DeplorableMe
Yet the 'Lucy' myth was debunked decades ago. In fact the so called expert who made up all the claptrap and called this nonsense 'Lucy' even admitted it was a Pigs tooth and pieces of an Orangutan skull. And the perpetually stubborn still insist a pigs tooth was the an ancient human. These scientists should be ashamed of themselves and anyone continuing to teach this rubbish should be fired.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Sir Henry RawlinsonReply toDeplorableMe
You do realise that you're wrong, or lying don't you?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
CrazyWorld1Reply toDeplorableMe
No he is right, it is common knowledge Lucy is a fake.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
DeplorableMeReply toDeplorableMe
Sir Henry Rawlinson, maybe you should do a little research before calling me a liar. You're sitting at a computer but because you don¿t like the facts you call me a liar instead of informing yourself. The man that invented Lucy did it on purpose to gain prestige etc. He later ADMITTED it was fake. And yet it's STILL being taught as fact. HE was the liar not me! There are two kinds of people in the world those who want the real truth and those who want to shut them down. You're the latter 'Sir'.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
stinkpipeReply toDeplorableMe
You're thinking of the Piltdown Man hoax of 1912 in England, not the australopithecine 'Lucy'.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Tuna SandwichReply toDeplorableMe
DeplorableMe is getting his strawman / guilt by association fallacies mixed up. Then again, DeplorableMe may well get his orifices mixed up when he needs to ablute if he does not whistle.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
JaybelleReply toDeplorableMe
What a bunch of berks. It was 'Piltdown Man' that was faked using a pig's tooth and ape's skull in Sussex. There is no evidence that 'Lucy', an example of H. afarensis was faked. But I guess no one comes to the DM 'science' section with either an education or even the barest ability to consult Google...
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
CrazyWorld1
The amount of certainty they can give about foot print sex lives, Is the same certainty they can give for millions of years...ie none.Creation is 5985 earth years. Just deal with it.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
stinkpipeReply toCrazyWorld1
You are an interesting exception to the rule that anatomically modern humans must also be modern in their thinking and behaviour.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
CrazyWorld1Reply toCrazyWorld1
Who says I'm anatomically modern? Certainly not your momma. Ha.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
stinkpipeReply toCrazyWorld1
Oh dear.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Big Nugget 1
WHy ALWAY Asume their husabnd / WIFE,, their could be LADY / LADY mat ing pair >e g. an L G B T relashinships are naturel 4 Humans> WHY DOES DM HIDE THIS. DM REaders R closed minded. I Pray 4 U .
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Levelandsane17Reply toBig Nugget 1
Yes please!!!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
pugseyReply toBig Nugget 1
Haven't heard from you for a while Big Nugget .Enjoying yourself now you are out of the sedure ward again?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Big Nugget 1Reply toBig Nugget 1
YES YES, PUGSEy > HOW RU? xx
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Maurice OxfordReply toBig Nugget 1
Big nugget, we can certainly see that your mind is wide open. So wide open that anything resembling intelligent coherent argument has fallen out and is lost.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Kevin
3.6 million years bull s*t thousands years yes
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
CrazyWorld1Reply toKevin
Yes,5985yrs,15 to go...
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
NOLAguy
Once again, more proof that Evolution is real!!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
sethman1975Reply toNOLAguy
How did this prove evolution? All it did was make the argument look even more stupid. The amount of guesswork involved is ridiculous. The theory of evolution (make note of the the theory part) is one assumption piled on another assumption.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Tuna SandwichReply toNOLAguy
"Make note of the theory part". I just made a note of the idiot part.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
SlapHappy
Uh oh. Religious people had articles on scientific discovery. They prefer to get their ''science'' from a 2000 year old book written by ignorant desert dwellers. They also believe that they can communicate with a deity by mumbling into their clasped hands.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
WispaReply toSlapHappy
SlapHappy be careful of your words.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Katina Cooper
Can't be that old. The billionaire preachers say that the Earth is only 5000 years old.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
OmmmmmReply toKatina Cooper
That's what idiots who have never read the book say-as it doesn't state it. Stay thick!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Stop ScaremongeringReply toKatina Cooper
Know your beloved book doesn't state that, but In the 17th century James Ussher Archbishop of Armagh studied the bible and calculated the date of creation. He determined "the entrance of the night preceding the 23rd day of October... the year before Christ 4004"; that is, around 6 pm on 22 October 4004 bc. Plenty of people still hold to this daft belief which would make the Earth just over 6,000 years old and most of these people are far more familiar with the contents of your book than I am. You are not going to deny that young earth creationists exist are you?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Stop ScaremongeringReply toKatina Cooper
Oh dear I need to pay more attention before posting clearly I meant, No your beloved book doesn't state that......
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
CrazyWorld1Reply toKatina Cooper
Earth is only 6000yrs not 5000yrs old. Come on, get it right.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Waskeyc
"hominins moving as a group through the landscape following a volcanic eruption and subsequent rainfall" Sounds like it's as likely to be a group of people fleeing a catastrophe as it is a man taking a stroll with his harem. I remember hearing about an ancient catastrophe that caused a massive loss of life. See Genesis 6-8, in particular, chapter 7, verse 11.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Tuna SandwichReply toWaskeyc
It appears you have no idea what a hominin is.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
To each their ownReply toWaskeyc
Oh you will burn for that one , aren't you bible thumping pixi in the sky loving people not supposed to think the earth is only 6000 yrs old or something or are you starting to look beyond your book of fiction ?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
KJV1611onlyReply toWaskeyc
Oh of course we all come from a Rock and became what we are today. That is your fiction but you carry on believing in Evolution where one day nothing became something makes a lot of sense
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
zadok22
Not all the evolutionist even agree with each other
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Stop ScaremongeringReply tozadok22
Er yes that because they are scientists and disagreement is an important part of how science work. They are however all agreed on one thing and that is that species evolved, they weren't created by an incompetent designer.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Darin Clements
Supposition based on no factual data.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
JohnReply toDarin Clements
So the foot prints are not factual evidence then? Would you by any chance be a Christian fundamentalist?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Be AwareReply toDarin Clements
"Supposition based on no factual data." - exactly like global warming; no factual data, only "computer models" and forged documentation from U. of East Anglia and NASA.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Darin ClementsReply toDarin Clements
John, have you always been stupid or is this a recent thing?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Wild Bill
Pfffffff howuch money was spent on this assumption?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
lafeReply toWild Bill
Why do you care? Wasn't your money
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
readbeforecommenting
The most poignant proof to date of the dreary private life that is the chain and ball of being a scientist. Any sign of human contact and their imagination runs wild.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Patty Pat
Of course they had multiple mates. This was back when men were men, and no feminism and PC culture existed.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]

评论

游客 请登录 注册