It’s a sea monster! China unveils world's largest amphibious aircraft used to fight forest fires and perform marine rescues

海怪一枚!中国惊爆世上最大两栖飞机,曾对付森林火灾和执行海上营救
Charlie Moore For Mailonline

国外网友评论 0人跟帖    3484人参与

George Wolf
The new Chinese Aircraft looks suspiciously like the Japanese ShinMaywa US-2 patrol plane; same T-tail, same hull, same hull-mounted main landing gear pods and same engine arrangement -- except the new aircraft is slightly larger, four wheeled main gear and has six-bladed propellers instead of five bladed propellers. The US-2 in turn is based on the PS-1 which in turn used technology from the Kawanishi H8K, Grumman HU-16 and the very strikingly similar Martin P-5B Marlin (except twin engines). All were World War II designs.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
sachomanReply toGeorge Wolf
I was going to say the same. It appears that they have copied the US-2 special hull design.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
PMOSReply toGeorge Wolf
They copy everything.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Karl LechtenReply toGeorge Wolf
..well now- Its after all IMAGINATION that counts; the mother of invention.As long as that contraption flies...... and not made from DUCK-TAPE (literally) ..everyone aboard-- huuuuuu...ALOHA-
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Morris OxfordReply toGeorge Wolf
GW, that's exactly what I thought as soon as I saw it.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Ptolemy
Hope the quality of the metal used in construction is a lot higher standard than the stuff they manufacture for sale to the West, because Chinese steel stock products are dire...Stainless steel that rusts before your eyes, steel bolts and nuts which strip threads before correct tightening torque is reached, components which crack and fatigue far too easily.... etc etc...
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Uncle BillReply toPtolemy
I don't think you'll find this plane in Aldi.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Old IronReply toPtolemy
You want cheap - you get cheap. You want better - it costs more. You want a steel aeroplane - it won't fly. Life just ain't fair .....!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
John1uk
Stuff and nonsense!! Try the Martin Mars or the Saro Princess flying boats. Both were much larger than this.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Gray12Reply toJohn1uk
The Martin Mars was still flying last year and is bigger and heavier than the new chinese water bomber. The daddy of them all was the Spruce goose as others have said.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
AndréReply toJohn1uk
There were three Saunders-Roe Princess flying boats built but only one ever flew. I saw SR.45 G-ALUN flying over Sandown Bay in 1953.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
GoodoldunclealbertReply toJohn1uk
and none of those is AMPHIBIOUS. This one is. That is the difference.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Dhenry
It looks a bit of a bad tempered beast! Might it smile when it's soaking innocents beneath?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Bill
Wasn't there an article just a few days ago showing a Chinese amphibious aircraft crashing during take-off on its inaugural flight.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
nonameReply toBill
Ummm thought its was called the De Havilland Comet or did I get this wrong? I am sure it was?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
CatweazleReply toBill
Noname, has anyone ever told you you're a mo ron?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
hardingj58Reply toBill
Floatplane which crashed into a bridge?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Stephen B.Reply toBill
It was an American built Cessna 209b Caravan that crashed into the bridge in Shanghai, China. Many C209s were converted to float planes.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
GoodoldunclealbertReply toBill
Built in Wichita, Kansas........
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
big time
May be is a camouflage for military purposes.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
HKerReply tobig time
China builds large planes to kill fires, US builds large planes to kill humans.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
ivantm1
Looks exactly like the Japanese US1/PS1.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Bob Manchester
The Spruce Goose was never actually used in WWII as your article says!!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Cornish Dave
The Spruce Goose was far bigger. The Martin Mars also.. And the Saunders Roe Princess. Of comparable size were the Blohm and Voss 238 and the Short Shetland. Every one of these aircraft is over 60 years old. The Martin Mars still flies to this day.. Lousy reporting by the Daily Mail.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
jonny g
I always loved the old Sunderland.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Goodoldunclealbert
"Before the AG600, the largest amphibious cast was the H-4 Hercules, known as the Spruce Goose, used in WW2".............DM really need to hire someone with even a basic knowledge of aviation. The H-4 Spruce Goose was NOT Amphibious. It was a Flying Boat that was incapable of landing on a runway......and it was never used in WW2......It flew only once in 1947.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Cynical CecilReply toGoodoldunclealbert
The Spruce Goose was not amphibious. It was a pure, and simple flying boat., just like the Martin Mars.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Berty Wooster
No it wasn't the biggest. The biggest is the Martin JRM Mars that has max take off weight of 75 tonnes, that's about 25% more. They were produced from 1945 and one is still in service in Sproat Lake. But what bother researching eh DM?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Cynical CecilReply toBerty Wooster
The Martin Mars is not amphibious...........it is a "Flying Boat", similar to the Spruce Goose which was/is also a flying boat.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Karl LechtenReply toBerty Wooster
...nanananaaaaaaaaaaaaa......hahahahahah !
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
GoodoldunclealbertReply toBerty Wooster
The Martin Mars is incapable of landing on a runway........so it is not amphibious. To move it onto land, "beaching gear" must be manually attached to the sides and tail of the aircraft.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Morris OxfordReply toBerty Wooster
I don't think the Mars is a true amphibian. I believe that, like the Short Sunderland, it needs wheeled dollies to be fitted for removal from the water via a slipway. Amphibious aircraft have self-contained and usually retractable landing gear so, they can exit the water independently under their own power.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Hugh Jarzole
The Saunders-Roe SR.45 Princess was a British flying boat aircraft built by Saunders-Roe, based in Cowes on the Isle of Wight. The Princess was the largest all-metal flying boat ever constructed. At 156 tonne max take-off weight it was three times the weight of this Chinese aircraft. As usual, no research done by the DM - just reprinting news releases. Such lazy journalism.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
BeachboyReply toHugh Jarzole
as a kid living near Farnborough i saw the only flying Princess at the airshow (1952 I think) it was really impressive but totally out of date even before it flew as due to the war virtually everywhere had runways
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Bob
It doesn't look that big.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
dai2000Reply toBob
It is far smaller than the Spruce Goose. The AG600 is 40m long, and wing of 40m. Spruce Goose is 67m long and wing of 98m.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Leopoldtrench
Why is the old Soviet flag in photo 3?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Open EyesReply toLeopoldtrench
Probably a joint venture, most of Chinas military and commercial machines have Russian technology behind them.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
StanMillerReply toLeopoldtrench
There is a Chinese Flag and the other is the flag of the communist party..
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
whirls
Bridge or bust
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
crawf
Looks like a modernized Short S.25 Sunderland.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
hardingj58
The Hercules was/is a flying boat, not an amphibian. Attempting to land on a runway would have resulted in a long steak of splinters and aluminium.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
GalahadReply tohardingj58
Not aluminum; the Spruce Goose was made mostly from wood. The theory behind it was to avoid using metals needed for warplanes, in order to build a plane that could fly lots of troops across the Atlantic while sneering at the U-boats below.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Uncle BillReply tohardingj58
A wooden plane would have a strange radar signature, too.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
hardingj58Reply tohardingj58
Until the props hit.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
OldMan46
Looks like a copy of Japan's K-2 seaplane.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Leninovich
Also exceeded by the Saunders Roe Princess of 1952 which was 5m longer and 66M wingspan. Isn't it about time the DM employed some real researchers rather than people who make things up - OH forgot it is the DM.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
GoodoldunclealbertReply toLeninovich
The "Princess" was a Flying Boat that was incapable of landing or taking off from a runway. Big difference.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]

评论

游客 请登录 注册