Okay, it is foreign policy testing time for the wanna be, trust fund baby, Trump.
Trump has called out careless and reckless rhetoric to leave Pacific/Asian nations to their own defense. Now, Trump says that if diplomacy does not work out, he would simply walk away from the table. China and Russia would eat him up and the trust fund baby would be left a babbling fool.
Does this mean that the trust fund baby would pull U.S. Military deployments in the Pacific back to Hawaii? He would leave allies from Australia and up through Taiwan exposed an vulnerable? And just how vulnerable would that leave our western front?
Our U.S. Military knows where we should be deployed, and I don't give an rat's rant what a careless and reckless rhetoric from a trust fund baby thinks our foreign policy should be.
Opinion from an Independent voter/Vietnam veteran who thinks that what he is really talking about is an Isolationist Policy for our already great nation, closing global market agreements, insecure sea lanes, and who wins? Billionaires. Who loses and gets hit with unimaginable inflation? The 99%.
Trump will have advisers and his decisions will be thought out and tempered. He is called "the blue collar billionaire" for a reason and anyone will be a big step up from we currently have.,
@Randy: Where did you ever get the notion that the trust fund baby is a blue collar billionaire? Absolutely baseless from Trump who, himself, has asserted and acknowledged that the Democrats make strong economies coming out of recessions. Trump would deliver for the billionaire club. Hillary would deliver for the 99%. Trump and the GOP know that. That is what has them frightened into panic, and you are reflecting what they, Trump and the GOP have been lying to you about.
"Military ships sailing in international waters a provocation? So if a chinese navy sub comes within 200 miles of the US coast, is it also a provocation???".
Japanese troll SOP exercising as usual.
#2 Playing dumb and street screaming like delusional Filipino trolls.
On the other hand, it is called "freedom of navigation, American style".
Until China gets rid of that syphilitic little chancre currently running North Korea, they will have to bear the brunt of international criticism for allowing him free rein to terrorize the world.
LOL @ poor Vlad! Do you and your vodka-swilling comrades think that the Fat Little Boy would limit his nuclear capabilities to the U.S. and its many allies?
I see 1 of 2 things when it comes to China & N. Korea 1 China is far weaker then we believe them to be and are simply afraid of NK or and most likely NK is doing nothing more than what China is directing them to do
Test of character is coming because I think N Korea is doing what China wants...for the area to become unstable so the Chinese have standing to claim more territory for their expansion.Kim takes the heat as bad boy, china cleans up on land, and the US has to show some character. Problem is they are so far away from us by the time we hear and react the whole thing could be over.
Then he better get the little Fat Boy in line. The US will NOT allow North Korea to station a submarine off our coast, equipped with nuclear ballistic missiles. Xi needs to put a short leash on that mad dog before he creates an incident that turns the Korean peninsula into a red hot wasteland.
Trump will fix it all. He will be HUGE. America will be Great. Maybe. But only if he's elected. If he loses, it's the end of the world. And, Bernie really needs to run as an independent . By the way, that IS real, genuine Pekinese Trump wears on top of his head. His other rug is genuine Pomeranian.
And if the little fat kid launches a missile at someone, the Chinese are going to prevent a response? They certainly can't stop the first launch, now can they?
"BEIJING (Reuters) - China will not allow security on the Korean Peninsula to deteriorate, China's President Xi Jinping said on Thursday at a security meeting with foreign ministers from Asia.
(Reporting by Michael Martina; Editing by Paul Tait)"
Is it the reporting or the editing that blows in this story?
Enjoy your lead now china as soon this Weak President will be gone and you are going to be dealing with an AMERICA that is #$%$ off. Our soon to be president Mr. Trump is going to squash you and your sorry #$%$. AMERICA FIRST!!!!!!!!!
@ m Why does''t the US get rid of the missiles ??? Why is US telling countries what they can and cannot have ??? Who anointed the US to be the police of the World ??? NK should continue to do what they do !!
Xie has full head of black hair and is very handsome man, looking many years younger than his age...But he is using North Korea as his proxy to endanger the South Korea, Japan and the United States. Unless China invades North Korea and cnages its regime, removing all missiles and nukes, war is very much inevitable !!!
well, if President 11 is so adamant about "peace on the peninsula", then why did China sit idlely by as the Bad Haircut Boy developed nukes??? how does THAT "stabilize the far east"??? hard to decide who is more FOS over there...but with ObamASS at the helm, it is a wonder that Venezeula doesn't have the bomb...or the Vatican...
China will not allow chaos and war to break out on the Korean peninsula, which would be to no one's advantage because their bff NK will just get their ax kicked again and they will have to spend a $trillion coming to their rescue. Again.
They do not want to deal with streams of NK refugees if the country fails apart... same for SK. The fall of the Berlin Wall and Germany's unification severely taxed West German resources, and it still has some effect. Also, a unified Korea might mean that the NK border has changed to one that is influenced by Western powers.