Humans will NOT survive another 1,000 years on Earth, says Stephen Hawking: Physicist warns we must 'escape beyond our fragile planet'

霍金预言人类不能在地球再存活千年,物理学家警告需逃离支离破碎的地球。
Shivali Best For Mailonline

国外网友评论 0人跟帖    13347人参与

CarolO
Just as well for our planet really - but why should we go and ruin another one?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
HughMungus
His brand of science has become a religion with it's doctrines you can't question so it's understandable they've got a revelation end of the world story.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
MickHoltham
Nice one Stephen. We all love an optimist.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
redskelf
And then we can go and destroy another planet. Better the human race dies out.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
rogsugeo
it should read ''The Earth will not survive another 500 years with mankind still here"
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Skeptic_1Reply torogsugeo
I think the earth will survive, as with nature but not in the form it is now. Once we have gone there will be a chance another evolutionary explosion.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
already1984
Well wont make any difference to any of us .
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Dr MTG
It's such a chilling possibility that we are inclined to put it to the back of our minds.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Tim
What a stupid comment. The universe will not suffer if humanity ceases to exist and will most will not benefit if a few thousand humans leave the planet.It would make more sense to just find a way to ensure that the planet is livable for as long as possible and that means controlling things like the population, pollution, resource usage etc.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
DaveResnam
Wrong! One hundred years max.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
DemmiNyxides123
Mr Hawkins no need for the reminder, the way we humans have evolved we shouldn't expect this planet to last no longer anyway
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Alexp58
Wrong, 300 years. Look at Krankie (SNP leader ) the way she is acting?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
TOM.
We need to escape from our fragile country first.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Markopolo08
The way society is going I'm not sure if I'll want to spend a thousand days on Earth!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Corran04Reply toMarkopolo08
Society is repeating itself just look at history. Nothing new is happening.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Veritus infinitum
And go to mars, and try to seed mars, breathing more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere and trying to oxygenate the atmosphere of mars, next big step...
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Disgusted
1000 years - that long eh?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
TruthBeTold12
Our only choice is to get to a global steady state solution. We are 7 Billion people on a finite planet. 1st thing we need are global population controls. Instead of carbon taxes, we need a procreation tax that kicks in after 2 kids, that would stabilize consumption, fixing a lot of things. Unfortunately, all the world economies are dependent on growth to be successful and rising populations are fueling our growth, not only innovation. We need to de-link our measures of success (growth) from expanding consumer populations. Without obsessing with growth, we 7 Billion people on this finite planet, could work a lot less, enjoy life more and save our only inhabitable planet in the process. Our competitive natures are killing us.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
JenReply toTruthBeTold12
The majority of large families occur in very poor communities, living on the edge of starvation and with HIGH infant mortality! How can you tax people who have nothing? You show zero understanding of the problem.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
TruthBeTold12Reply toTruthBeTold12
Oh, I understand, I have visited many developing countries. Since the problem is difficult, we aren't going to try and come up with a global population control solution? You could do things like country level incentives, similar to greenhouse gas/carbon incentives like in the Climate Change protocols.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Opti MistReply toTruthBeTold12
Just what the Global elitists want you to say. I expect you voted to stay in the EU.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
machine man
Oh yes and take our innate evil with us !
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Antony ReesReply tomachine man
Totally agree. Moving house never alleviates the issues. What this planet needs is infinite grace to rid us of our evil not infinite space...
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Audene Marie
Would living in a space suit or in a tightly confined space be considered living or surviving? Personally, I'd chose to stay here where there are beaches, mountains, plains, animals, and sun.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Chickster2015
Despite Hawking's undoubted talents as a physicist - this is tea-leaf reading at its heart. He cannot and he knows it predict what will happen in 100 years, let alone 1000yrs. I have no doubt mankind will find a way to go into space - intersellar as well as interplanetary within the next hundred years. The problem with eminent scientists and a couple are colleagues - they begin to believe their own hype. They no longer say 'this is where we are at, until new discoveries happen' they say 'this is what I believe and thus it's fact'. He is 'working to prove' his thesis, which means he already believes it's the only one. He will, of course, be proven wrong at some point, as were all those eminent scientists for 2300 years until the English physicist Priestley discovered oxygen in 1774. He wrote 'Few concepts have laid firmer hold upon the mind, than that air is a simple elementary substance, indestructible and unalterable."
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Old SamReply toChickster2015
actually hawking has been wrong about everything and has been exposed as being a F.raud. he has as much credibility as bill nye the science guy who is not even a scientist but an trained electrician
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Old SamReply toChickster2015
if you did a little research on hawking you would know this.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Madbob
That's the arrogance of the Human race, we destroy this planet but Hey Ho let's go find another one to obliterate
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]

评论

游客 请登录 注册