China 'needs more nuclear weapons to deal with Trump': Government mouthpiece newspaper says extra defence is required should US treat Beijing 'unacceptably'

"中国需造更多核武应对特朗普“，政府喉舌报称需加强国防力量以防美国针对中国。
Gareth Davies For Mailonline

国外网友评论 0人跟帖 　　 4322人参与

michael england
just get out of Tibet and the south china sea they do not belong to china
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
alex f
China with ICBMs, they are more likely to blow themselves up given their history of poor quality control.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Xtian
Build an embasy in Taiwan and Tibet to make them more angry...
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
karl26
Build what you will comrade...Japan and the USA and South Korea will do the same.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Taking it easyReply tokarl26
....you imbecile....no one wins should nuclear weapons be used.....smh
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
grahameReply tokarl26
Did he mention "Use"?
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Globalist
More proof that the Globalists will bride government officials to warmonger no matter which country they're in. Trump made a fool out of them, this is their way of coming back at us.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
tennger
Enter your comment China has gained significantly from adopting Western technology and open trade. Maybe it is time to adopt some Western style diplomacy instead of reverting back to it's old ways of threatening the West the instant anything goes against it's liking.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
karl26
Build what you will comrade...Japan and the USA and South Korea will do the same.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
grahame
Shut down all trade with China and within a year they would be broke!
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
NaviragdeReply tograhame
And the shelves in US stores would be empty.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
devon123
Don't think building more nuclear weapons would change Trump policy.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Ray in L.A.Reply todevon123
Maybe reducing Twitter's character count limit down to 139 would help deter new'clar war?
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
laughing buddha
free tibet
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Joe from Florida
Just wait until we make those Iphones here.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
NaviragdeReply toJoe from Florida
If iPhones were made in the US, the price would increase (for the cheapest model) from $660 to $2000.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Campfisher
Japan should have Nuclear weapons with a range of a 1,000 miles. We should not have to deal with this BS. Lets encourage China to reduce their capabilities by enabling Japan to protect themselves.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Scott Wein
The idiot Chicomns actually think you can "win" by using those weapons.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
NothingToLose
Has China ever stopped all those threatening, hateful rhetoric? On the other hand, Taiwan (Republic of China) has always been our ally since WWII. Are we too stupid to see it through? Hope their DF (Dog F art?) 41 blow up in their face.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Michael Soren
Or... Xi Jinping's grandson could show him how to use Twitter. Just a thought!
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Patriot
Who will be the US ambassador to Taiwan?
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
loreng
Are they threatening nuclear war over trade deals, seriously
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
TennJackReply toloreng
Those trade deals mean life or death for their people, we would do the same. Get used to the new nuclear threat.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
SeussicalReply toloreng
Yes, they are, seriously. So maybe the Toddler-in-Chief wants to get someone else to talk to China for him.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
NaviragdeReply toloreng
Most wars have been fought over economic reasons.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
TexasBorn5
I keep coming back Russell Crowe's line in the "Gladiator" ........ "Do I not entertain you?"....."Mr Trump, you certainly do...." Here's to 4 yours of entertainment!!!!
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Atheismisunstoppable
Never in the field of human conflict was so much death caused to so many by so few
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Hurricane123
Perhaps it is time to limit them from coming into the USA in case they are moles or potential sleeping terr0rists waiting to attak when they get offended.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Outspoken001Reply toHurricane123
I've been saying this for a long time but our government is so naive
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]

页面


评论

游客 ☂ 请登录 注册