The Indian/Chinese IQ puzzle

Around instances of need to have and crisis predicaments, you will study faxless on their internet pay day loans
which always have been for sale.
If ever the candidate actually does not repay you see, the sum within fifty
days, he/she gets to be lawfully liable for penalty.

Wow. Why is it so important that we have to retaliate against every single word that has been posted. Why does the general IQ test results, that was posted based on the study done on a few subjects be taken so seriously. There is a high level of probability that the group consists of high number of feeble minded people. The IQ of a person can improve when introduced to a better environment. So please find something better to do rather than wasting your time arguing who has better IQ.

What a pathetic article. No scientific basis too. Indian’s too value education despite the corrupt government that is its bane. Out of five people with better IQ, than Einstein and Hawking, two are of Indian origin,yet to see a chinese better that.Now coming to cheap goods that is being produced by copy cats that is because the same is being encouraged by the Chinese government while in India there all these archaic labour and enviromental laws hampering development.

@ xia chu, lol, another south asian posing as east asian. last time i saw some indian pretending to be white trumping up indians, and of course claiming that same crap as 1 in 3 are engineers, 1 in 5 are doctors lies… i wonder that’s the same indian pretending to be chinese above making up another lies about better IQ than Einstein. Looks like south asian really have nothing better to show, lol, that’s just pathetic. common, south asians, more lies, keep them keeping, keep us east asian entertained.

hey xia chu, you think taking on a chinese name and emulate bad grammer would make people believe you’re a self hating chinese? what’s your iq, 70? lol. 

Here, read the sentence below, and write back your response in chinese. based on your bad grammar, you should be a native chinese, then you shouldn’t have any problems understanding this sentence.

你真的以为印度人比中国人聪明？就你那点脑子？

of course, I already know the answer… man, you south asian really think you can pull off shit like that on an east asian? the lower end of south asian iq is truly astounding, well, maybe that should been expected.

hey “xia chu” the indian, do you know how easily your lie about “Out of five people with better IQ, than Einstein and Hawking, two are of Indian origin, yet to see a chinese better that” can be debunked?

do your research before make up lies, some few minute research online should do the work, yeah, hate to break the news, south asians including indians are again, yes, again, way below east asian in iq ranking of any variety, including number of east asians (chinese, korean and japanese are all represented) with higher iq than Einstein and Hawking.

the iq level your south asian lies are simply substandard, yeah, keep them coming. lol.

Chinese were always ahead and will always remain ahead of the Indians in every field.

India has always been a country that is in favour of peace and love, India is the largest democratic country in the world and there is no comparison between India and China.

@ high iq sa, low iq ea do not have anything better to write ? , same bla bla bla, write some thing seriously man then only we can brush !!!

@ Chinese Hanuman, Chinsese were ahead in every field than Indians ? Chinese were ahead only in two fields than Indians, 1) making children 2)  in Martial arts, that too was taught by an Indian Buddhist monk “Bodhidharma” to your grand fathers. Indian Philosophy , Arts, literature, music were all superior than Chinese any time, then the modern world technology ? that neither Chinese nor Indians can claim, leave that to west, we all are copy cats,  Then future, nobody can predict now ..

@Astro, of course debating something non-quantifiable such as “Philosophy , Arts, literature, music”, people can always claim they are better than everyone else. More Chinese than any group can claim chinese “Philosophy , Arts, literature, music” are superior than indian anytime in history, argument like this goes on forever in the absence of quantifiable measure. so indian like you claims indian “Philosophy , Arts, literature, music“ are better than chinese, and us chinese think chinese “Philosophy , Arts, literature, music” are better than the indians, haggles like this won’t change anyone’s position.

@astro, “in Martial arts, that too was taught by an Indian Buddhist monk “Bodhidharma”??? how entertaining. lies after lies after lies, where you pull that from, indian press / website, the origin of all lies?

a quick search through all east asian websites, including korean, japan, taiwan and china indicates no indian influence whatsoever in martial arts. keep dreaming, another lie debunked.

@ high iq sa, low iq ea Surprising you never heard of Bodhidharma ? just Google ” Bodhidharma and Shaolin kung fu ” and then get back to me ....

@astro, I’ve done the research even before I posted above, I stand by my argument. Martial arts was not taught by an Indian Buddhist monk called “Bodhidharma”, you should’ve done more research.

@ high iq sa, low iq ea,  Bodhidharma is the father of Shaolin Kung fu and the first patriarch for Zen ( Chan in Chinese a twisted pronunciation for Dyan in Sanskrit). Your ego is not accepting this, especially in this site, no problem entire world accepts this, even your grandfathers had already accepted it so we do not need your personal opinion on this, have a good day man !!!!

@astro, shaolin is by no means the origin of chinese martial arts, there are many branches of martial arts in china, indigenous grown(southern chinese style, northern chinese style), mongolian influenced, manchurian style, korean influenced, japan influenced, to say indian taught and started chinese martial arts is as ludicrous as saying english was started by chinese, if I point out tofu and kowtow are chinese derivations. Like i said you should’ve done more research and that has nothing to do with my ego.

even claims by indians that shaolin kung fu was started by an indian is hugely questionable and been debunked by east asian historians countless times. According to the chinese old scripts, shaolin practitioner were already using martial arts to defend themselves from warlords and thugs before Bodhidharma, Bodhidharma at most, at most, only contributed a few indian elements to the already established shaolin kung fu.

if your “entire world accepts this” meaning entire “indian” accept this, then you are entitled to your opinion. but it is obvious that the entire east asian bloc has debunked this indian claim numerous times, my grandparent as well as your grandparent will think the notion that chinese martial art was started by an indian just as ridiculous.

@high iq sa, low iq ea, entire world is not entire Indian yet may be one day at least in ideas. I do not reject that there were many branches and styles of martial arts in china, indigenous grown prior to shaolin kung fu, but Shaolin Kung fu has a special place and most probably the most superior one . Bodhidharma was a prince from the warrior class of the southern India where the best Indian martial arts comes from. Chinese martial arts is the most superior to any, no doubt about it, but Bodhidharma is credited for teaching the Shaolin monks the Shaolin Kung fu according to Chinese Shaolin monks not by Indians, Why monks need to lie ?, if you argue that this is false then even Chinese monks are liers then what to say about normal Chinese guys like you (could be double liers). By discrediting Bodhidharma you are discrediting your own ancestors. You have no way out rather than admitting the facts or else you will be throwing tar on your own face.

@astro

two points,
1) Shaolin is not the most superior in china, it is only one of the superior. Back to the original topic, Shaolin is not the origin of Chinese martial arts, by logic that automatically disqualifies the notion that indian taught or were the origin of chinese martial arts, your ancestor will find your notion ridiculous, and looks like you already dug a hole for yourself, and yes, either way, you can’t get out.

2) to you argument about shaolin kung fu, as i stated earlier, it’s “questionable”. searching through all east asian country websites and I find no links anywhere to the old scripts stating shaolin kungfu was started by an indian, most only indicated Bodhidharma probably had taught at Shaolin at some point. look who got caught red handed again lying? “taught” does not equal to “originally started”.

@high iq sa, low iq ea, So at least now you know the name “Bodhidharma” good that you learned about him and your stand changed to “questionable ” do more research “your doubts will go off “but if you are biased, even your brain will not be helpful to you, that is all I have to say man .........

@astro, looks like you never read any of my previous posts… “questionable” for that specific topic was mentioned two posts ago. looks like you haven’t done any of the research nor you know what you’re arguing about. well, at least you admit indian wasn’t the origin of chinese martial arts, that’s all i care… have a good one.

@ high iq sa, low iq ea, Look yourself at your 851 post, it implies that initially you didn’t even know who is Bodhidharma. Even East Asian websites has tons of information about him. I didn’t say the traditional Chinese martial arts was originated by Indians, every country has their own martial arts but the Shaolin Kung fu was originated from Bodhidharma, Every student of Karate, Okinawan, Japanese, Korean or Chinese martial arts knew him well because Shaolin Kung Fu influenced every other form of East Asian martial arts and took it into a different realm which we knew today and it is just because of Bodhidarma, in that sense you can say the real Chinese martial arts was started by Bodhidharma (damo) ( If you guys find it hard to accept him, just because he is an Indian origin just accept him as a Chinese man, he too has a Chinese name ( ). Harshening the power of prana ( chi ) and its power with body movements are the main key Elements unlike the traditional martial arts prior to Shaolin Kung fu, though there were Daoist influences prior to this which I do not deny. Bodhidharma taught moving meditation exercises (Yi Jin Jing) to strengthen the bodies of the monks which are replicated from the yoga-like mind/body postures which evolved in to Shaolin warrior monk fighting styles and techniques. Copies and translations of the Yi Jin Jing survive to the modern day. The Eighteen Arhat Hands (Shi-ba Lohan Shou) and an internal practice called the Sinew Metamorphosis Classic. (or “Muscle/Tendon Change Classic”) and the Xi Sui Jing are also credited to him. Even Japanese martial arts evolved from Zen, Zen and the principles of bushido, “the way of the warrior,” which grew out of Zen Buddhisam. Just for your information Bodhidharma is also the father of Zen Buddhism. Chinese and Zen Buddhists monks took these techniques to its peak. The controversies are instigated by Taoists hostile to Buddhism as Buddhism over run Taoism. Bodhidharma still lives through many East Asians monks and masters who were genuine and unbiased unlike you new generations who had lost the estheticism and broadmindedness due to communism. You yourself said you only care to see that an Indian is not the founder of the Chinese martial arts, you do not care for the truth. You are right if you take the traditional Chinese martial arts, but not the root of the one we see now. There were Scientists before Newton but Newton has a special place. Anyway I do not have much time to waste on it. I am no one to change your deluded stand so be happy with your concepts and live in a corner.