The Indian/Chinese IQ puzzle

关于中国人、印度人智商长达10年的争论
Posted by jonjayray

国外网友评论 0人跟帖    48247人参与

high iq ea, low iq sa
on Sat, 08 Dec 2012 05:31 | 861

@astro, looks like you now done some research, that’s a good start. Bodhidharma didn’t start chinese martial arts and nor does he has kind of influence you claimed. do some more research, you are simply rehashing pretty much what you stated earlier. if you can’t provide anymore convincing evidence to persuade me, i say we should stop here since none of us will change our position.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Astro.
on Sat, 08 Dec 2012 07:10 | 862

@high iq sa, low iq ea, I expected some counter claims from you , Since you couldn’t counter any of the above, I take it as an exit from your side !!!!!!!

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
high iq ea, low iq sa
on Sat, 08 Dec 2012 19:26 | 863

@astro, the counter arguments have already been stated in the many posts above. There are numerous scripts in east asia that put other branches of martial arts equal or above shaolin, including e’mei, wu tang style. the reason these branches don’t get as much exposure in the west is because they aren’t affiliated with any religions such as buddhism (where shaolin is affiliated to). Any chinese would tell you e’mei (峨眉), wu tang (武当), and others were the origin of different branches of martial arts in China. to say that an indian called Bodhidharma started or even significantly influenced various major branches of chinese martial arts is simply ridiculous. Up til now you still couldn’t provide any evidence that Bodhidharma were the origin and started all major branches of chinese major martial arts, i just have to say this whole “indian started chinese martial arts” is just another one of those lies started by your indian government/press and right up there in the same league of trash as “1 in 5 ____ are indian, 1 in 3 _____ are indian” type of claims. if you want blame someone, blame your so called “pretend-to-be democratic” government/“free” press who’s only freedom is freedom to make up exaggerations and lies.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
GKM
on Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:34 | 864

Have you heard of Culture-fair IQ test? The IQ testing scale should be culturally fair, otherwise it would be biased. The IQ scales are suited for western person and that is why they score well. I have met many western people in my field. From my experience, I can say that Indians in my profession are much knowledgeable and smarter than their western counterparts despite having less exposure. Similarly, many Indians with professional degrees who migrate to developed countries because they don’t manage a job in India, do exceptionally well in the migrated countries. I can say that Indians are superior brain. The only fault with Indian is that they are very very corrupt people. If they can fairly utilize their superior brain and IQ very soon they will rule the world. Thanks

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
MJ
on Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:04 | 865

To someone who says Han Chinese could not achieve an IQ score above 60, I feel sorry for you suffering of reality distortion, and for your poor reasoning ability.

To Chingla: When I read your words, I feel like an ape yielding “see, my fur looks better than your human’s”.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
tdk
on Sun, 16 Dec 2012 05:52 | 866

Indians will rule the world? delusional. It’s like saying if china weren’t constrained by communism, china would been a superpower 30 years ago and would be ruling over everyone by now because of their superior IQ. not surprisingly, many chinese actually believe that. at the end of the day, 90% of the third worlders brag about their supposedly “superior” race that should have ruled over everyone if it weren’t for one reason or another, again, excuses are excuses.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
GKM
on Thu, 20 Dec 2012 08:25 | 867

Dear tdk, Best wishes.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Stephane
on Sun, 23 Dec 2012 22:37 | 868

Irwin is South Asian pretending to be from Mosco.

South Asians (India, Sri Lanka, etc.) tend to do less well than Europeans, East Asians and Jews (European or Israeli).  India isn’t known for technological, scientific, medical or philosophical achievements or research.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
klv
on Mon, 24 Dec 2012 21:13 | 869

Dear Stephane, I have read the former posts of Irwin. You are probably right; he is not Russian but Indian. And the inventor of radio is Nikola Tesla, not Marconi or the so called (unknown) Indian like he claims. I am not surprised because I have witnessed countless times that the Indians are bastard liars.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
South Asian
on Tue, 25 Dec 2012 09:00 | 870

South Asians (India, Sri Lanka, etc.) tend to do less well than Europeans, East Asians and Jews (European or Israeli).

Do less well in what? Immigrants to Western countries from South Asia seem do pretty well. Maybe South Asians aren’t as smart as East Asians but they can perform to a level similar to East Asians in immigrant communities.

philosophical achievements

</blockquote>

Buddhism seems to have done well in East Asia after having originated in India.

Spiritual crap from India also seems to do well in the West.


<blockquote>scientific

Bose–Einstein statistics, Chandrashekhar limit, Raman effect, etc. would beg to differ. Weird that there are so many Indian names in science if India is not known for scientific endeavours?

medical


Cataract surgery was first developed in India apparently and so was inoculation. India has its own system of medicine - -Ayurveda -  as well.

 

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
South Asian
on Tue, 25 Dec 2012 09:14 | 871

Research

Five Indian Institutes of Technology were listed among the top 10 science and technology schools in Asia by Asiaweek.

http://www-cgi.cnn.com/ASIANOW/asiaweek/features/universities2000/scitech/sci.overall.html

—-

So there you have it. Indians are present in these fields and not absent as the above posters seem to claim. There are many smart Indians as well as other South Asians. East Asians are more smarter admittedly but this isn’t a competition.

The East Asian commentators here (who I do not believe represent the East Asian population at large—from my experience the normal Chinese person is quite nice and affable) seem to build their pride in the denigration of South Asia. Their claim to a better IQ they think is rendered moot if even the slightest hint of respect is given to their neighbours to the South. Highly racist they are brimming with vitriol and bank on the popular images of India as a country of beggars to scoff and laugh. But such a defensive nature begs the question, what do they find so threatening?

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
SAMBIT
on Sat, 29 Dec 2012 08:42 | 872

@KLV

  Are you the same guy who came with the name Indian strategy?Even if it’s not true then I(the very few people in the blog who understand the science or specially Physics have already said that Tesla deserved the Nobel prize for invention of radio more than anybody else(read my reply to Indian arts).But quite frankly speaking no body single handed invented radio but it was a cognitive work of all.

Tesla is one of favorite idol and this is what Tesla said in 1901


“Marconi is a good fellow.Let him continue,he is using 17 of my patents” but Tesla also never experimentally showed his dream world wide energy transmission because J.P.Morgan screwed him saying he could not finance such a grand project(as always a pragmatic businessman would do) which required huge amount of money.

But if you talk about wireless communication then It Was JC BOSe,a Bengali polymath from India who first experimentally showed it in 1894,2 years prior to Marconi.Now if you say he is unknown to you then I have got one thing to Say” I FEEL PITY FOR YOU DELUSIONAL NERD”.

In September 2012 IEEE President felicitated Bose with a plaque award (he becomes one of 3 Asian to win this award) for his work on “wireless communication,microwave optics,polarizer,de-polarizer et” which has revolutionized the world of communication/telecommunication.

In fact the computer which you are using today,most of it’s diode,microwave uses were invented by him for which IEEE has felicitated him but still both Sampan and me (we both are Bengali) have praised Tesla more than Bose for invention of Radio.

Yes many Indian are liars just as many Chinese in this blog because when people can not achieve anything by their own they have to take shortcuts,lies,faking etc but if you read my previous post or post of Sampan or Great(all 3 of us were Bengali and we did not lie a single word in this blog because Bengal has achieved more than Entire India and China together working in their home).

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
indoaryan
on Mon, 31 Dec 2012 13:09 | 873

I think that the greatest tragedy was India’s rejection of the most profound religion humanity has ever produced i.e. Buddhism. Apart from ancient Israel, only Indian (Brahmin) civilization is the only one that rejected God.

The result is for everyone to see. A country of 1.20 billions will certainly produce a few genius but overwhelmingly India is even behind Africa in infant mortality, diseases, crime etc. Filth and squalor like in Indian cities is not found anywhere in world.

I think Indian IQ may be more in the range of 75 rather than 100.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
SAMPAN
on Mon, 31 Dec 2012 18:33 | 874

Indoaryan has made good points but Indian Hindus have IQ around 85+ which has gone down due to Muslim(20%) by a little margin but rest of your post is delirious since Hinduism never rejected god but if you don’t believe me then read what Swami Vivekananda,a Bengali Hindu mystic who mesmerized every American through his speech at Parliament of world religion held in Chicago 1893 said about Hinduism.Harvard philosopher said"here is a man who knows more than all our professors together”.


In his 150th birth anniversary on 12th January,2013 I hope he will be remembered again in that country but from ancient time Hinduism and Buddhism had more similarities than dissimilarities that you have pointed here.It was extremely disappointing that due to Muslim invasion Buddhism was vanished from India and for 1000 years the barbaric age was prevailed for by Muslim but once the British came a new enlightenment came in society which marked the 19th century Bengal renaissance.


Since you are talking about Brahmins then I must say less than half million Bengali Brahmins of Kolkata have achieved more than your 1.5 billion Hun Chinese working in their home.Bengali Brahmins has produced one of greatest polymath of all time Rabindranath Tagore, who was also the first non European origin to win Nobel prize(excluding peace) in 1913 and has also got the record of composing 3 national anthem.There was another Brahmin from Kolkata whose work has won Nobel but your 1.5 billion China so far has produced one literature Nobel(this year winner who is not a foot note compared to Tagore and another peace winner who is still living in jail)....So how can half million Bengali Brahmins outperform 105 IQ 1.5 billion Chinese(isn’t it delusional)!!!

I have already said Hun Chinese will score less than western norms but I am not sure about the exact range because the Chinese whom I have seen in USA or In my native Kolkata don’t represent the average of entire China but even if I keep standard deviation in my mind it will be somewhere around 90-95…certainly not more than that but Japanese should have Median above western avg but we need a more tangible analysis for both India,china or East Asia because couple of cities or states don’t represent the entire nation which has different social and economic variance.


GOOD BYE.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
high iq ea, low iq sa
on Tue, 01 Jan 2013 04:55 | 875

look and look at these low iq south asian trumping up their low iq Brahmin again. lol. There are 3 chinese nobel prize winner origin in Shanghai with root in southern river neighborhood. The people of shanghai southern river neighborhood with population of 100K achieved more than entire south asian of 1.2b population. And yes, there are more chinese nobel than nobel winner of all south asian origin, period, and there are astronomical more east asian nobel than south asians, fact again.

So this so called indian literature nobel, “tago who?” his literature are at such low tier quality, the only reason westerners gave a literature medal to him is because westerners needed to award a subjugate nation to justify colonial presence, nothing else, it’s more like a sympathy award for a colony, and yes, award only when south asia (including bangals) is under western control, a big consolation prize for this third tier writer. Look how south asia hasn’t been awarded of any literature prize after westerners left, a testament of south asian (including bangals) sub-par capability. (There are two chinese literature nobelist, both wrote only in chinese and won with ease all the while the chinese are still being treated as enemies by the west)

like i said before, these so called Brahmin are just like rest of the south asians, with an average iq of 81 or less.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
high iq ea, low iq sa
on Tue, 01 Jan 2013 05:11 | 876

@South Asian, there are concerted effort by south asian, especially the indian to attack chinese by trumping up the indians and denigrating the chinese. many of these indians take advantage of the fact that majority of the chinese don’t come to english forums so rarely can we defend ourselves (a ratio of almost 1 chinese vs. 10 indian on any english forum), many indian saw this opportunity and pour anti-chinese rhetoric across the web, so don’t blame us, blame your fellow south asians.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
SAMBIT
on Tue, 01 Jan 2013 07:29 | 877

Hey look that idiot has again posting with that same tag but that nerd does not know apart from those two mentioned rest of those from Taiwan,china and Hong kong Nobel laureates have done their work in west and have won Nobel with foreign Nationality.But you people are such bloody fools taht you can’t even take the names of your Scientist or inventor but come up with full of bs such that 3 origin Chinese…Bengalis with 1/30 times population that of Hun Chinese have achieved more than what China has done in in last 150 years.For example when JC Bose Invented Wireless communication in 1894,most of the Chinese were living in dark age and even today In Kolkata most of them are feeding themselves by Selling leather products,shoes or restaurant business…It’s true that India also has not produced a single great scientist or Nobel laureate working in their home(except Mathematician Ramanujan) but when China’s contribution is too low then how can you say that you have 20 points IQ difference?Yes whites,Anglo saxon can boast because even before Nobel prize they dominated the world of inventions since the days of Renaissance which took place in 15th century but China has not achieved anything significant in modern period so that I will have to salute you bro…Always except the superiority of your Master,otherwise all you are doing is making mockery of yourself.

Now you people may give 1000 replies but I don’t want to talk with morons who don’t even understand anything about science,technology but try to make intellectual comments such that they have not heard about that scientist(Unknown to them)...Yeah when semi literate dumb people try to make smart comments(or pretend to be one of them) they make a big fool of themselves but again they are too dumb to even understand their idiocy.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
high iq ea, low iq sa
on Sat, 05 Jan 2013 04:44 | 879

hahah, wow, looks like the facts i stated earlier really hurts, look at this low iq clown who’s so angry he can’t even talk properly, hahaha. yes, three chinese nobelist root in shanghai southern river neighborhood - the “southern river shanghaier” with population of 100K have achieved more than and kicked your 1.2B (including your so-called bengal)south asian ass, is that too hard for you to swallow? lol. yeah, get used to it, your guys are physically and intellectually inferior. and yes, you south asians in guangzhou, hongkong, japan, singapore live in the ghetto and are getting by cleaning streets and toilets, so what’s your point bringing up chinese living in kolkata? oh i get it, low iq people aren’t capable of coming up with convincing comparable examples, you are too intellectually challenged, it’s ok, i understand.

oh boy, it’s so much fun poking these low iq-ers in the nuts and watching them jump up and down calling out all kinds of names while spitting out big talks, lol, low iq indeed. “accept our superiority”, “lower iq than my pet dogs”, hahaha, man, your people just can’t talk without using BIG words AND without substantiating facts.

here are some facts for you to swallow, east asian including the chinese won exponentially more nobles than your south asians, fact; won exponentially more intellectual and physical competitions, fact; way over and above you south asian (including your bengals) in social development, economies and technologies, fact; every single south asian country is in dark-age sub-Saharan african condition even with democratic governments and generous western help, fact again. i know, you low iq people aren’t capable of using facts to talk, so stick with what you do best, empty BIGGGG talks, “accept our superiorty”, “lower iq than my pet dogs”, “greatest scientist”, oh boy, don’t you look so smart, lol.

you guys love to trump up your no-one-care-about bottom tier scientists, the truth is, no one else in the world gives a shit. “Bengal scientist”? what an oxymoron, trump all you want, we simply don’t give a crap about your so called third tier bengal scientists, at least I reserve some respect for the indians, the bengals? hahaha, wow, indian and pakistanis are definitely above your guys.

for your information, > 4 chinese received Nobels while they were citizens of China (both Republic of china and People’s Republic of China) . people like you don’t even bother doing 30 minute online research, what can i say, given your guys are challenged in some way, hahaha.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Sampan
on Sat, 05 Jan 2013 15:23 | 880

Don’t lie you chinky because your Chinese Govt declared this year that entire China is proud for it’s first Nobel laureate in history because they did not even consider 2010 laureate(who is in jail) as their own people but Kolkata with 5 million population is the home of 6 resident Nobel laureates and one Bangladeshi laureate also spent some time in that city…so guess what, one particular city has achieved more than your 3 Chinese country added together and we have done our work in Kolkata,not using the resource of others which you people can’t do but as Sambit mentioned one J.C Bose has given more to the world of science and inventions(working in Kolkata during 1890’s using 60GHz but I guess you don’t even understand what that even means) than all your Chinese inventors and scientist together.Similarly his student Satyendra Bose in my opinion has contributed more to world of Physics than all your Chinese Physicist together as already 10 persons have won Nobel based on his work including coldest matter of the universe Bose Einstein Condensate.

I hope you will stop this stupid argument here because intelligent Chinese here are not making these sort of irrational,IQ deluded statements like you,who is living in his own dream world of superiority complex for which you are not even worthy…check it!

F.Y.I-Your Chinese literature Nobel laureate got Nobel because one American from Notre Dame university translated his work in English while Tagore knew how to translate his work in English(although it was shit compared to his original Bengali version).

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
high iq ea, low iq sa
on Sat, 05 Jan 2013 20:08 | 881

hahaha, truth really hurts huh? so bad so these people start calling profanities like a true low iq person would do, can’t wait to display your iq huh? lol. hey chill, don’t chimp out, not enough banana?

here are some facts, i know you aren’t capable of doing your own research. three chinese won while they were Republic of China citizen, after Republic of China were overthrown by the communist, three more won while they were Communist China citizen, is that fact so hard for you to grasp? the fact that communist government refuse to recognize a few for political reasons doesn’t change the fact all these people received nobels while they were citizens of China (Republic or Communist), understand? I know you’re intellectually challenged, so take some time to digest, eat more banana, and do some tree swinging, that might help. At least 10 nobel laureate (including foreigners born in China who later received nobel and Southern River Shanghaiers) studied at, stayed significant time or associate with Beijing Haidian district, so a district of 2 million contributed more than 1.2B of you south asian ever produced throughout entire history all added together, not to mention nobels won by rest of the east asians. you think only your low-iq south asian know how to play this numbers game? you south asian are like bugs, easily get crushed by us east asians. we kick your ass in every single angle your small bird brain can come up with, bring it on, keep us east asian entertained. 

Without British bringing resources, your south asians can’t do crap, as evidenced by lack of a single nobel after british left, and almost all your few pathetic nobels won while under british control or with foreign citizenship. “led to 10 nobels”? lol, i guess if you aren’t capable of winning, let’s lie and make up a story that we “contributed” to other people’s nobels, of course without substantive evidences, lol. these low-iqers are playing such childish games, a grand display of low-iq at work, hahaha. Sure, gun powder invented by the chinese directly led to the success of Nobel, which in turn led to all the Nobels awarded in the world. You want to play this stupid game, let’s play game, we’ll crush you low iqers, not to mention your guys can’t even back up your claim with FACTS, lol. Like i said earlier, south asian(including bengals) love BIG EMPTY talks, if they get debunked, they started spewing out profanities and lies, displaying multiple traits of low iq, lol.

here are more facts for you to digest, given that you low-iqers have no concept of fact base conversation, so let me show you what are facts vs. BIG-EMPTY-TALK-LIES-BRAGS:

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
east asian including the chinese won exponentially more nobles than your south asians, FACT;
won exponentially more intellectual and physical competitions, FACT;
way over and above you south asian (including your bengals) in social development, economies and technologies, FACT;
every single south asian country is in dark-age sub-Saharan african condition even with democratic governments and generous western help, FACT
Indian hasn’t won any nobel without resources provided by the British colonizers or do work in the west, FACT
East Asian IQ 101-108, South Asian IQ 79-84, widely published measured IQ scores from these two regions, FACT
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

now let’s see these South Asian claims:
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
this south asian (fill in the person) is the greatest scientist ever, foundation of all science -  because we South Asian SAID SO
this south asian (fill in the person) work led to (fill in the blank) number of other people’s nobles - because we South Asian SAID SO
south asian contributed more than (fill in the country) - because we South Asian SAID SO
this south asian work is the foundation of (fill in the blank) science - because we South Asian SAID SO
1 in 5 in (fill in the blank) is indian, 1 in 3 in (fill in the blank) is indian - flat out lies
we in 20, 50, 60 years will surpass (fill in the country) - lol
you have lower iq than my pet dogs - lol
accept our superiority - lol
“einstein of ...”, “greatest of ....”, “foundation of ...”, “greater than all… together” - because we South Asian SAID SO, lol
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

These low iq people demonstrated again and again their “superior” logical thinking capability, lol. Congrat, the lower limit of your guys iq is truly boundless, we east asian bow in reverence.

FYI, same to you, few intelligent Indians don’t go around slandering and posting anti-chinese comments across the web, but so long majority of you south asian keep attacking/provoking us, we’ll make sure you get what you deserve.

[ 0 ] [ 0 ]

评论

游客 请登录 注册