Have archaeologists discovered Buddha's remains? Skull bone found in 1,000-year-old shrine could belong to the enlightened one

考古学家发现佛祖遗骸？
Ryan O'Hare for MailOnline

国外网友评论 0人跟帖 　　 4698人参与

Alan
The bone being encased in gold and silver does not mean it is genuinely part of Buddha's remains, only that it was thought to be. There are so many of Buddha's teeth in existence that if they are all genuine Buddha had a head the size of a crocodile
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
donkeycongReply toAlan
Non protected quite like this one ..
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
JaybelleReply toAlan
You're wrong, Donkeycong. Many so-called relics of the Buddha are enshrined in highly elaborate caskets, stupas and temples.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
sap55koala
The Buddha gave up everything. He was a prince and very rich, he gave it all up. He would NOT have Wanted this memory
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Magnus
A Zen master once said to me, ¿Do the opposite of whatever I tell you.¿ So I didn't.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
barReply toMagnus
I'm sure then that you will be able to hear my hand clapping.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Move Along Cat DongReply toMagnus
This is the sensation of the internet not caring. 021134
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Jaybelle
I'm sure Siddhartha Gautama would have reminded us all that becoming obsessed with his remains was just a form of attachment that detracts from following the path.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
LeeWReply toJaybelle
The problem I have is remaining unattached to practising unattachement.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
TotellthetruthReply toJaybelle
Modern religion/spiritualism/belief systems are always mockeries of the original.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
ajblack
IN A WORD....NO !
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Dazeddazza
Yeah, right!
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Three_Circles
an enlightened mortal being who left an interesting legacy.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
It must be said
As with all headlines in the DM starting with "have". The answer is No.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
BoBReply toIt must be said
If the headline ends with a question mark then the answer is always going to be No...
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
obubbleteao
Wow
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]

页面


评论

游客 ☂ 请登录 注册