Forget Dory! Can YOU spot the fish hiding among the octopuses? New aqua-themed brain-teaser leaves the Internet baffled

别管多莉啦！找得到躲在章鱼中的小鱼吗？
Emily Hodgkin For Mailonline

国外网友评论 0人跟帖 　　 8154人参与

SunnySouthwest
No one is "baffled". Pathetic article. The only thing that baffles me is how the author of this rubbish still has a job.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Bearwithmaidenfair
I found this quiz and stopped doing what i did. But I couldnt find the fish, believe it or not! I called my family to solve it for me but they couldnt find it either. Then I phoned my friends and colleagues but they couldnt find it either. We were all sooo baffled! Then I rang every door in my street, but no one could find this little fish! We then scrolled down to find the fish. We were all so happy and laughed so hard! We had a party then on the street to celebrate this fantastic internet quiz we all were too stupid to solve! !
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Observer1976
Once the "internet" is done with solving DM's rubbish teasers, the image will most likely go somewhere down the page, only to be rehashed when the next imbecile teaser is uploaded.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Citizen Khan
Same article just with another picture that 'drives the internet insane'. Do you feel like you have achieved something Emily after writing this article??
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
skellyReply toCitizen Khan
Emily is a real true bone fide 'germalist'
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Citizen KhanReply toCitizen Khan
There some article in femail just now with do men prefer less make up .. the girl in it is Emily Hodgkin from London.. I wonder if that's her...
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
burnfieldReply toCitizen Khan
Can't believe you lot are stalking her
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
aGiantSquidReply toCitizen Khan
I find this unfair on Emily! Kate Samuelson did an almost equally terrible article on finding the number of squares, yesterday. However, Emily wins this round, since the egg/rabbit, panda/snowman thing is vomited up more.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Mike19Reply toCitizen Khan
Kate blocked me on Twitter because I questioned her journalism skills and asked her why she claims all views are her own when all she does is copy and paste!
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
CinesMum
Doesnt take much to drive the internet insane ffs!
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
tel lincs
In a national paper bloody stupid if you ask me there must be better things to report on.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
My User Name
Hate to tell you this DM writer, but Dory is blue
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
footinmouth
Just F off with all this nonsense now.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Joely
the plural of octopus is not octopuses, but octopi
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Exeter UkipperReply toJoely
Correct. The standard plural in English of octopus is octopuses. However, the word octopus comes from Greek and the Greek plural form octopodes is still occasionally used. The plural form octopi, formed according to rules for some Latin plurals, is incorrect.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
KevinBailey
OCTOPUSES? Dreadful.....
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Quasar
found it in 5 seconds - these are getting BORING now DM
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Jon Sims
what tosh.. I saw that and that is a tentacle with a twist in it.. However the Blue Tail can only belong to a fish.. But even if either is right you still cannot see a fish.. You can at best see only a part of what may be a fish.. It's so stupid..
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Thelastword
No. Utter drivel.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Gungaglyn
What a bloody waste of time.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
CreativeSource
Yes I spotted it, it's just 'there'. Can you all see it...?!
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
SpetsnaZ
Its not even a fish
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
iancReply toSpetsnaZ
It's a quarter of a fish. Hardly fair.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Mrhammerman
Can you spot the dumb persistent journalist boring us with this junk? Clearly on commission for adverts.
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
sags72
Can YOU spot the decent journalism on this so-called newspaper's website??
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
TOMOPIMIP
Why !? Why !? Why !?
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Citizen KhanReply toTOMOPIMIP
They just love to pi$$ us off with all the pointless articles
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]
Laura
I was looking for a fish! Not a blob with one eye!
顶[ 0 ] 踩[ 0 ]

页面


评论

游客 ☂ 请登录 注册