Biggest explosion in documented history is STILL a mystery: New study fails to find cause of 1908 Tunguska blast that 'split the sky in two' and flattened 80 million Siberian trees

史上最大爆炸仍谜云重重
Cheyenne Macdonald For Dailymail.com

国外网友评论 0人跟帖    7766人参与

Whawha
Didn't Mulder sort this out years ago on the X Files?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Tania
What if this had happend in the 1950 s Nuclear war for sure
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
ALEX KOSMOSReply toTania
Still so far nothing happened, but can happen in the future and I am afraid near!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Theproff
I see the DM has been trawling the kindergarten for writers again. Unintelligible drivel. What we do know, was this was an impact by a celestial body, because the blast pattern tells us so. What type of body, we do not know. There were no fragments from a meteor. An icy comet is more likely. But there is the interesting problem of the illuminated nighttime sky. Would ice crystals in the upper atmosphere be able to refract or reflect sunlight from beyond the horizon, to illuminate the night - like some vast noctoluminous cloud? It is an interesting possibility.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Old IronReply toTheproff
Catch is the herds of instantly-barbecued reindeer - awful big, hot, bang in there somewhere.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
jenniferlynReply toTheproff
@Old Iron- would the massive flash from the blast be sufficient to roast Rudolph without there needing to be significant heat associated?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
JonathansAxe
When an object moves from frictionless space into the atmosphere, which provides resistance, kinetic energy is released in the form of heat energy. If the object is moving fast enough, any atmosphere at all will behave like solid rock does against objects travelling at earthly speeds. Think of it like when on earth something hits water at high speed. The water seems like solid rock. The same goes for things hitting the upper atmosphere at the sort of speeds possible in space.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Tangerine Blue
There was an alien timeship on it's way somewhere, and there was a disturbance in the warp tunnel. Resulting ripples made this happen. And those time travelling spacefarers never even realised they indirectly caused this.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Tony MReply toTangerine Blue
M'kay.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
null
I don't think it's a mystery as such. Clearly something has come from space and exploded or broken up near impact.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
foghorn leghorn
There has to be some sort of common residue embedded in the trees facing the blast however small? Have they done a spectrometer analysis of samples from trees over a wide area?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Ted LoonReply tofoghorn leghorn
They haven't thought of that yet.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
WIthnailReply tofoghorn leghorn
Nah, they probably forgot.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Paul_Xavier_GreenReply tofoghorn leghorn
Careful research about this incident will reveal that microscopic metallic fragments were indeed recovered from ground zero, the surrounding flattened trees that survived any conflagration and other locations in the area. The bright flash of the explosion charred distant tree trunks on one side, and left the opposite side untouched. A bit like a nuclear explosion. All these and many more facts about this incident have been carefully documented in BOOKS.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
AztecReply tofoghorn leghorn
No, surely not. Scientists with years of experience in these matters must have forgotten to do that, despite several times going through all the options for which devices to use. Regular laypeople always know better how to do science than scientists who have studied their respective fields thousands of times more than the laypeople. This is the reason why I (an accountant) will perform heart surgery on a loved one if he or she ever needs one, because those heart surgeons never know what they are doing.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Denis BarreReply tofoghorn leghorn
Aztec: I bow before your sarcastic wit!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
foghorn leghornReply tofoghorn leghorn
Aztec- Assumptions make fools of us all you as an accountant should know this .
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Logarithm John
I've got a copy of "The Fire Came By" by a John Baxter(?)-that looks at this in some depth, but written for the layman. Trouble is-I can't find it!!!!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Mem
The thing I find intriguing is how the font on the science pages is always larger than other pages of the DM
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
LeeWReply toMem
It is one way of filling a section of a web page if there is not much textual content.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
rscassReply toMem
Text is bigger to fill the void left by not having the word Kardashian appear 147 times.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
hapenny23
How lucky can people be, this happened over unpopulated tundra and not over a major city. How long can this luck, seen since, hold?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
philash
For many years scientists have been trying to prove that this was caused by a Tesla experiment.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Denis BarreReply tophilash
Fixed it for you: "For many years tinfoil-hatted conspiracy theorists who know nothing of the scientific method have been trying to prove that this was caused by a Tesla experiment."
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
philashReply tophilash
Dennis: Thank you for the amendment. You clearly know more than I so perhaps you can tell me if they succeeded ...
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Just saying...
Yeah I heard that a meteor(ite) came in so fast that the heat build up from friction through the atmosphere was so intense that it fractured to the point of exploding, so the theory goes, but if its still up for debate, who knows.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
John
The Daily Mail needs to employ some fact checkers, it's not the largest explosion in documented history at all. That prize goes to the Russian 50 megaton Tsar Bomba test in 1961, the fireball alone was 5 miles in diameter and the mushroom cloud 40 miles high! Everything within a 34 mile radius was incinerated and burnt to a crisp, at 62 miles away the thermal pulse was still so intense it could cause 3rd degree burns to human flesh and ignite exposed wood, at 560 miles away the shock wave was still powerful enough that it shattered windows and furthermore due to atmospheric focusing the blast caused damage as far away as Finland and Norway. The Tsar Bomba test was actually scaled back because the Soviet Union feared fallout from the test would contaminate its own cities, had they utilised its full capability it would have had a rating of 100 megatons. Had such a bomb been dropped on Birmingham for instance during war it would have destroyed cities as far away as Exeter and Newcastle!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
privatesearch50
It has been determined that this article blew up in the UKDM's face, in meteoric fashion. PS: Saw me a show on TV where some scientist explained the figure "8" damage pattern of the blown-down trees, & demo'd it on a small scale. PS: Don't forget the asteroid ka-booming over Chelyabinsk, Russia in 2013. That one was just a baby.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Phil
"locals believed the explosion stemmed from the visitation of the god Ogdy." I'll go with that one, seems the most plausible.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
manoftheredvanReply toPhil
No it was his cousin ogdy Mcogdface
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
BiancaM
The comments are brilliant.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
rossowheels
Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth. Arthur Conan Doyle
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
eileen.Reply torossowheels
google Occam's Razor a problem solving principle
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Colin
They had a referendum and Siberia voted to leave Russia so the sky fell down.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Zebeedee
We do not have a similar event for comparison but a lot of the witness testimony does not describe what we would expect from a meteorite/Asteroid strike. The one that I find strangest is that these things transit from outer space to terminating somewhere in the atmosphere or ground in a very short time as they are traveling in the 10's of kilometers a second, however many eyewitness reports have this thing taking 10 minutes to go through the atmosphere with a brilliant white light before terminating in its fiery explosion(s) ( more than 1 reported). A ten minute journey would surely limit the velocity of this thing to something inexplicable as a meteorite/Asteroid strike!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
hardingj58Reply toZebeedee
Ten minutes? In 1908 some trappers saw a light in the sky and you are offering substantiation of your position with third and fourth hand interpreted "eye witness" accounts. I have seen a skip which was probably 70 km up that traced for three minutes, so I am more inclined to accept that the blast pattern was a shockwave from a meteor detonating at altitude and scattering meteorites over hundreds of square km.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
scowieReply toZebeedee
That may be because the asteroid was visible before entering the atmosphere due to having a cometary nature. I reckon it was an electrical discharge between earth and comet/asteroid that caused this airburst. The asteroid then carried on it's merry way after, possibly with it's cometary nature having been switched off due to having equalized it's electric charge with the earth.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Only joking
My monies on Ogdy, only logical explanation.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]

评论

游客 请登录 注册