Humans will NOT survive another 1,000 years on Earth, says Stephen Hawking: Physicist warns we must 'escape beyond our fragile planet'

霍金预言人类不能在地球再存活千年,物理学家警告需逃离支离破碎的地球。
Shivali Best For Mailonline

国外网友评论 0人跟帖    13349人参与

The xyz
Can't survive too much longer with the current population numbers. We are already double+ the long term number of humans for our civilisation to survive. Tough choices that we just won't make. We will continue breeding mindlessly until we destroy ourselves. Sad, but true.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Ursus RexxReply toThe xyz
Re: "...Can't survive too much longer with the current population numbers..." {The xyz, West, Argentina}Like ALL earth-species, we will either learn to control our over-reproduction / greed, or...Mother Nature will control these issues for us!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
The xyzReply toThe xyz
@Ursus Rexx .... Couldn't agree more!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Peter
As others have said below, reducing the human population by cutting the birth rate is the answer to most of the planet's problems. Especially true of the serial overbreeders who tend to be at the lower end of the evolutionary chain. Will be an unpopular comment but the truth often is uncomfortable.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
hedjuk1Reply toPeter
Hark at you. Wonder how high up the evolutionary chain you are?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
PeterReply toPeter
Near the top as it happens!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Dimension9Reply toPeter
It won't be unpopular on the daily mail site... and it's a good comment. At the moment though we are paying people to breed in this doomed country. Things are soon going to change however. The house of cards is about to come crashing down and we are all in for a very big set of changes...no more funny money printed out of thin air and everything cut to the bone and beyond, jobs lost, people rioting in the streets. Those that think we have austerity now....wow...are they in for a shock.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Solasu
What for humanity is doing a great job of ruining the planet so why do we want to go and destroy another? The world would be a beautiful place but for the people on it and before you reply with idiotic statements that includes me and you for we are all playing our part in one way or another.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
The History Man
He may be good at physics and Maths but he is clearly a plonker when it comes to the environment. If we cannot make a success of our wonderful planet with its perfect living conditions and amazing abundance of complex interlocking biological systems, due only to our stupidity, pollution and self interest, then how are we going to live in space or other planets which lack even the most basic elements of life. There are NO habitable planets in our solar system and even if we knew of any outside of that, it would take life times to get there. Yet so far, nobody has ever created a self sufficient self maintaining environment on Earth, let alone what would be necessary for long term space travel.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Barbidex
It won't last that long if we continue to entertain the middle age living religion.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
lakotahopeReply toBarbidex
Well, maybe I red flagged you prematurely........Middle Age Fundamentalist losers are destroying their own Earth.......
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Grey Singh
if humans cant make earth (a planet perfectly suited for human life) work for themselves, what makes him think humans could make somewhere else work. he is supposed to be smart right?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Recce
tis best and most wonderful to see nature untouched and unspoiled by humanity, that applies to this and any other planet. Man will never be fit to habit other worlds because either Capitalism, Socialism or Religion will always ruin what nature created.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Retrochicky
The worst thing that ever happened to this beautiful planet was the human bloody race! Greedy, destructive, over-populating demons!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Dakota
I don't think we will. And after what we've done to the planet and its animals, do we deserve to live another millenia unless we change radically?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
wake up
I give it within 50-100 years. It will be wildlife and insect decimation (already 67% of wildlife lost in 45 years and growing). Without those the ecosystem is toast and we're done.Regarding space colonies, only the elite will be on board any rocket heading up, so forget it.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
cwjonesReply towake up
And still the baby breeders will be banging on about more ivf!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Kit boyReply towake up
99% of all life forms that have ever lived on earth are extinct they just get replaced with other ones over time
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
aTALLmidget
Stephen Hawking will not survive another 1000 years on earth. Of that, I am certain.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
f58tgv
Overpopulation is the key. The taboo subject no one will ever be brave enough to address.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
CarolOReply tof58tgv
I actually put that FACT in one of my degree assignment essays and was told to remove it or my marks would suffer! That's how taboo it really is!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Shaznay HadenfreudeReply tof58tgv
If contraception were freely available to all then overpopulation wouldn't be such an issue.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
phough
Steve us mere mortals think if we get to 2017 in one piece it will be good
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
HalfTheWorldAway
Oh well its not like any of us are gonna be around for it
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Tzap
Hope all the cats, dogs, rabbits and mice survive!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Pablo
He is such an optimist!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Marshian
I do wonder sometimes if this chap is, literally, on the same planet as the rest of us! There is NO reachable replacment plant within a human life span. Please don't bore me with your ScFi Warp drives, worm holes, terra forming or cryogenic suspension, it is ALL theory and ain't gonna happen any time within the next millenia. Our best chance is to stay put and deal with the consequences, life has survived other cataclysmic events and without the intellegence to do so in the past. Sure we may not be able to sustain an ever increasing population an perhaps not even the current one but a core of humanity will survive and continue to do so beyond the next 1000 years.This chap has an ego and desire to go in to space, don't we all, but the pollution caused by space travel does more damage for the rest of us than it is worth, especially if it is done for vanity reasons.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Alexis M.Reply toMarshian
Actually that's not true. There is increasing evidence that we could locate and occupy a "rogue planet" (on that does not orbit in a system- they could vastly outnumber orbitally locked planets). We would not want to permanently colonize one, but they can serve as jump stations.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
MarshianReply toMarshian
Yep, you are as truely deluded as our Mr. Hawkinge Alexis. Mind you I fully expect your new president to do a "Kennedy" and soon announce that your country will soon launch a pointless trip to Mars!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
CannotTakeItWithYou
It wont be nuclear or a virus - it will be plastic. It's poisoning everything.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
tobor
The world has to cope with high levels of human breeding in places that can't sustain them, and mass exodus to places that struggle to cope with them
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Lesley
Unlimited human population increase versus limited resources to sustain life. We should at most just be replacing ourselves.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]

评论

游客 请登录 注册