New cell treatment could help us live a THIRD longer: Life expectancy could leap to 108 with controversial cell rejuvenation technique
细胞回春术引争议:新细胞技术延长生命1/3,可活到108岁
Shivali Best For Mailonline and Colin Fernandez Science Correspondent For The Daily Mail
Worn Out
Why do this? We currently have a crisis of an ageing population that we can't afford, who is going to pay for all these people living to 108 or will the retirement age go up to 95? Lets stop seeking eternal life and be happy with some good years of retirement and leave some space and money for the younger generations.Carpejugulum
We can't afford the elderly population we have now. This really is the land of nightmares. The NHS will certainly not fund this but rich people will find clinics in some compliant countries to administer the treatment. When they return to the UK how do state sector pensions deal with the extra cost? Stop payment at some nominal age? Supposing someone bankrupts themselves to get the treatment and then throw themselves onto the benefits system? Our politicians can't think years in advance, let alone decades.Boden
Ask many elderly and they are waiting to die. My grandad died last week at age 95. He has wanted to die for a few years as was tired and had had enough. He only managed to die at home because he refused to be sent to hospital to be rehydrated. Good on him. He had mental capacity and died in his sleep at home 3 days later and surrounded by his loved ones.Aunt JasmineRoseReply toBoden
It depends on the person. Husband's granny (86) was depressed to be the last one to go among her peer group while my mom-in-law is 90, her sister is 92, happily go about independent living. We just bought her a new car over the summer. She and her sister will mostly likely happily live to 100. But we feel if one of them go the other will go quickly. They are sister BFF. One widowed the other long time divorced. They are each others partner.