The Allied invasion as you've never seen it before: Stunning colorized photographs show battle-torn France in the aftermath of D-Day

这幅联军进攻图你没见过:惊艳彩照告诉你,诺曼底登陆后战火弥漫的法国
Simon Holmes For Mailonline

国外网友评论 0人跟帖    8970人参与

AS
The 2 "Great British Whines": 1) We hate Yankee interventionism. 2) We hate that the Yanks took so long to intervene and save our necks in the 2 WW's.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Nursechick66Reply toAS
I believe you may have had other reasons than saving our necks...like worrying about a Europe controlled by Russia and the fact the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbour...but thanks for saving us along the way
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
mariluReply toAS
@Nursechick, you do realize that we were on the same side as the Russians, don't you?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
adamtwinReply toAS
Well at least I know who I'd call on in an emergency to help my fellow human beings in dire need and not worry about another that likes to sit on their behinds and not do anything until most of the work has been done.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
WENTWORTH
The French were all in HIDING, LOL! Thank goodness the BRAVE BRITISH were there to save their country FOR them!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
NYCKate132Reply toWENTWORTH
Not according to Dwight D. Eisenhower, who praised the invaluable contribution of the French Resistance. Let's also not forget that France, Belgium etc. were still re-building from tremendous losses and destruction of WWI, the Depression, etc. They took the physical brunt, more so than many.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
france2-0germanyhahaReply toWENTWORTH
That is a disrespectful comment to french people that faught and lost their lives.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Beppe SaponeReply toWENTWORTH
The French had a problem and Britain would have had the same ... Resistance was met by German reprisals like murdering all the citizens in a village.... Oradour ... Tulle ... there is a long list.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
ASReply toWENTWORTH
WENTWORTH 30,000 French troops maintained an extremely effective rear guard defense at Dunkirk allowing 350,000 British troops to throw down all their weapons and flee back to Britain. A few months later 100,000 British troops surrendered to 25,000 starving and ill equipped Japanese at Singapore. Pity there weren't some French troops at Singapore to protect the Brits.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
austin morris
ww2 irrelevant now - another threat is here and this time our own leaders are in our enemy's side
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Hereward the wake
Lot of yanks here belittling Britain's leading role in D day.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
USAisNumberOneReply toHereward the wake
Y'all begged us to get involved & save your butts. We did...
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
SoshiReply toHereward the wake
Not so, although Hollywood would make one think so. Thank God for Winston Churchill and the stamina of the English people. We Americans admire the English for their courage and perseverance so move on and make it a non issue.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
NO NameReply toHereward the wake
Nobody's belittling the Brits at all. As a matter of fact, you're belittling Americans who in turn have to come up with a defense.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
jael5235Reply toHereward the wake
Oh, shush and have some tea.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Fox.Hunter
And without Russia's help the UK would now be speaking german
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
ASReply toFox.Hunter
And without the USA's help you Brits today would be speaking Russian. Don't mention it.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
BigMac01Reply toFox.Hunter
Yeah, but without our help (Arctic convoys), it's unlikely they would have survived against Germany. Let's be honest, ALL the Allies were essential to victory.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Pink Panther
Interesting DM but we stood alone for 2 years against the Luftwaffe and dodgy tash supported by our colonial family before the Yanks got out of bed, anychance of some pics? Also without the Russians we would never have won it, any chance of any pics?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
JohnReply toPink Panther
Yeah, and without Lend-lease the Germans would have stomped the Russians (which they had been doing for quite some time). Remember, Germany was fighting against 53 other nations at one time, on multiple fronts. Long-live the brave Wehrmacht.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Yankee NationalistReply toPink Panther
How about you convince a British youth to take pride in his country and colorize some photos for you.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
ROBURReply toPink Panther
John -- Why are you Yanks always so ignorant? What 53 nations are you talking about? After 1940 there was only Britain and its empire fighting (together with Greece until April 1941) until late June 1941 when the USSR was invaded. After you late-comers, I don;t recall any other significant nation joining the conflict - unless you mean Brazil! Lol!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
smartboneReply toPink Panther
@Yankee Nationalist; I would like to think our British youths are in school, learning English language and grammar, and not using words like colorize, which is actually a word at all.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
lindashaReply toPink Panther
Jared Enos, the young man who does this, said, some where in all these comments that he has done some of the Brits, but he can't release them because they don't belong to him.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
bhqzReply toPink Panther
Britain didn't have cameras?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
TwoToneTartanReply toPink Panther
bhqz - No, the Brits had rifles in their hands instead of cameras. Alone, fighting for our very survival until Germany declared war on the USA - yes, it was that way round! Also by the way, Britain declared on Japan BEFORE the USA did! Those are FACTS, do feel free to check them out.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Yankee Nationalist 2Reply toPink Panther
smartbone, I'm sure that is what you'd like to think, but in actuality they're far too busy urinating on your war memorials. Also, I have a degree in English from Yale, so I'm in no need of a lecture from you on the English language. My dictionary tells me "colorize" (or "colourise" in your case) has been in use since 1979. It's defined as "to add color to by means of a computer."
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
MainlineflReply toPink Panther
Two tone - you were also the first to surrender to Japan as well. And for the record we weren't tied to your hip. This country had enough of EU conflict one generation before and that war still makes no sense for the carnage inflicted. Half of it between royalty who were actually related.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
BohemondReply toPink Panther
*AHEM* The reason Mr Enos does almost entirely pictures taken by US military photographers is because they those photos are all, by law, in the public domain. Pictures taken by British military photographers are under Crown copyright and may not be reproduced without permission and royalties.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
DannyMayo
War- where poor men die to make the rich men richer.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Nedarc
On D-Day at Normandy the American Casulties were 2,499 all other Allies casualties on that day totaled 1,914 (look it up). Omaha was the deadliest beach of the other four. For some of you who do not know your History and posting lies I would suggest a history lesson before you make fools out of yourselves. My Dad was with the 52nd Troop Carrier Wing dropping the Airborne behind enemy lines the night before the landing in unescorted unarmed C-47's and some towing gliders which they called for good reason 'flying coffins'. Once again America came to the rescue as in WW1. You brave but sometimes uninformed People would be speaking German today if it wasn't for the USA...Period !
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
FalklandsrbritishReply toNedarc
That is the most offensive thing a yankee can say- but maybe you meant it to be..
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
PaulReply toNedarc
if you think the US came to europes rescue in WW1 YOU need to look it up. they steadied the french line but their contributuion was minor. it was the threat they represented that scared the germans but the american contribution to WW1 was minimal.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
CharismaticReply toNedarc
Well said, Nedarc, as unfortunate as it was.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Nursechick66Reply toNedarc
Your dad was a remarkable person it sounds..it must have missed a generation
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
McSorley33Reply toNedarc
You simply have to visit Normandy beach to see which countries stormed which part of that coast. The Americans took on the portion of coast that was the least desirable from an attack standpoint.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
SJReply toNedarc
Some of us don't forget.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
DM SucksReply toNedarc
Nedarc: you are exactly right...
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
NeilywheelyReply toNedarc
Understand your anger but it's fair to say the Omaha landings would have been far less attritional if the tanks had made it to shore. I think getting into who is better than someone else doesn't stack up at all.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
LenReply toNedarc
"...you brave but sometimes uninformed People would be speaking German today if it wasn't for the USA..." ~~~~~~~~ Every time I see this nonsense I'm reminded that the teaching of history in our schools leaves a lot to be desired. Some times it's hard to tell whether the OP actually believes what s/he's saying, or whether it's just a little bit of unsophisticated trolling.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Obi WhippetReply toNedarc
Ever heard of the Soviet Union?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Hillary Blows
If the US were in WW II today we'd lose! Sad but true! Obama would run for cover!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
MikeBReply toHillary Blows
While Trump wouldn't?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Obi WhippetReply toHillary Blows
Trump would repeat his honourable military service, chiropody permitting.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
ArchbishopBanterbury
Where are the pictures of the French soldiers fighting for their country?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
ScottReply toArchbishopBanterbury
The French were bleed dry in WWI and strategically lost in WWII quickly due to the blitzkrieg. It's not accurate to criticize their fighting ability. The US has never faced what the French did, separated by two oceans.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
CaterineReply toArchbishopBanterbury
As Scott said ...
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Surrounded by foolsReply toArchbishopBanterbury
Interesting to see the figures in the French Resistance. Apparently only 2000 fought the occupying German Forces. No a lot. Most French citizens were happy to live under Vichy Rules. They hanged Petane when they were liberated though.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
GalahadReply toArchbishopBanterbury
"They hanged Petane when they were liberated though" Pierre Laval was shot. Marshal of France Petain was sentenced to life imprisonment.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
ratpack2233Reply toArchbishopBanterbury
The French surrendered to the Germans in 1940.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
ArchbishopBanterburyReply toArchbishopBanterbury
Scott, the French had an army. De Gaulle, who had run away to hide in London, insisted that French troops were the first to enter Paris on Liberation Day even though they had taken no part in the fighting.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
LenReply toArchbishopBanterbury
The Free French forces were present during the Normandy landings.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
ROBURReply toArchbishopBanterbury
Hey idiot! The French fought throughout WW2 - especially at Monte Cassino, where they took the heights. In fact by May 1945 they had the fourth largest allied army.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
ROBURReply toArchbishopBanterbury
Surrounded by fools --- Shame that you are so ignorant about WW2. You were even wrong about the fate of Petain.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
LesleyDSReply toArchbishopBanterbury
Yes, and what about the Ardennes with the Americans retreating and say to the British soldiers (my father was one of them) don't go up there boy, it's rough, the British DID go up there and finished to job.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Obi WhippetReply toArchbishopBanterbury
In a different photograph album. Dedicated to the Resistance.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
dd33
2 million Indians volunteered to fight in WW2 for Britian. As usual they are ignored. They went through hell especially in the Japanese prisoner of war camps. Very sad.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
CromwellsGhostReply todd33
Plenty more switched sides to fight for the Japanese against the British - lets publicise that....
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
dd33Reply todd33
Many Brits changed sides aswell to fight for the Germans. It happened in every country.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
steveReply todd33
dd33 that's crap and everyone but the severely under educated knows it.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Tennessean
You might think you're going to read comments praising this young man for colorizing (colourizing) some WWII photos. But no, you're going to read comments from Brits whining (whinging) about the facts that no Brits are in the photos. That will lead to comments about how the American (Yanks) downplay the British contribution to the War and assaulted the easy beach, that Americans can't spell, are stupid, etc. etc. and you thought it was about this 19 year old. Of course not.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Be AwareReply toTennessean
Take a chill pill, Tenn. We (Americans and English) rib each other all the time, but in the end, we're still related. You might find one in 100 who are trolls, but with those odds, roll with the punches and enjoy the camaraderie! Heck, you're interacting with the English!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
FeddupReply toTennessean
No Brits, no Canadians, no Poles, no Free French, no ANZAC, no Indians, no French Resistance, no Dutch Resistance, no Royal Netherlands Navy, no Royal Norwegian Navy, no....... (not an exhaustive list). We were Allies, not an add-on to US forces.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
ElsieWReply toTennessean
I think most people know and acknowledge that the Normandy Landings took place on several beach heads, with troops from many allied nations taking part. They also know and acknowledge that a photographer can only be in one place at any one time, so has a limited number of choices. Let's be grateful that the photographer survived so that his pictures could be enhanced by a modern young man and shared with us all today.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
GalahadReply toTennessean
Feddup, Yorkshire, United Kingdom: Why would you expect to see photos of other than Americans in an article about photos of Americans? That's like expecting to see British troopsin Saving Private Ryan--a movie made for the American market, about an American military mission carried out by American personnel in the American sector of the Normandy Beachhead. I presume you would have expected to find some British commandos in it, to show the incompetent US Rangers how things were done.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Amanda
Didn't realise I was looking at the US version of the DM ...COLORIZED??
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
GoosehReply toAmanda
resistance is futile on this site now, much more revenue from the US for the DM
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
pugseyReply toAmanda
Funny isn't it that these colorized photos taken by American photographers with American combat units only show photos of American soldiers.I wonder why that is so.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
M D Johnson
After Obama and the Democrats, out soldiers today would be lucky to be half as well armed and equipped! As for the quality of leaderships? Now that's a sad joke that is even more frightening!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Purple Panther
Let me give you Americans an example of how infuriating Hollywood war films can be to British people. In films such as 'Patton' and 'Band of Brothers' Americans are glorified while British and Canadians are ignored or even ridiculed (as in 'A Bridge Too Far'). Patton did not 'break out' in Normandy. In fact he 'walked out' in the words of his fellow generals such as Bradley. All he did was follow the retreating Germans. It was Monty's breakout not Patton¿s. The claim (Bridge Too Far) that he was the only general the Germans respected is a myth invented by Hollywood, originally for the film 'Patton'. In Sicily as in Normandy the British did the fighting and Patton did the boasting.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
JoNvirginiaReply toPurple Panther
Looks like you have your panties in a wad......I mean REALLY, did you expect anything but a bunch of BS from Hollywood? You do realize that their BS doesn't stop with war movies right?? It's called entertainment NOT documentaries. If you want the truth, try reading a history book.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
mtbrbeeReply toPurple Panther
As an American, I agree. Its sad really, hopefully it changes.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
The Lady of ShalottReply toPurple Panther
I think most people know that "historic" Hollywood films should be taken with a grain of salt. Besides, I'm sure there are many British films that get the record straight.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
GoBruinsReply toPurple Panther
Guess you aggrieved Brits and Canadians should make your own war movies then, huh...
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
John TavernierReply toPurple Panther
Hollywood usually gets things wrong, but this about how Monty did everything is roundly negated by just about every history book, America, British, etc. He was almost removed from command by Eisenhower due to sitting "on his laurels" outside of Caen and not keeping to the timetable.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
milspecteesReply toPurple Panther
So what? American movies are made from an American point of view for American audiences. You can use the same argument to criticize British movies falsely showing that the Brits won the war single-handedly. Only difference is, no-one wants to watch the British movies
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
adamtwinReply toPurple Panther
milspectees - 'Eh, no-one wants to watch British war films? You're talking nonsense there are many classics that far outshine films made from other international productions, such as, The Dam Busters, The Battle of Britain, The Cruel Sea, Where Eagles Dare, The Way Ahead, The Great Escape, Lawrence of Arabia, Bridge on the River Kwai, Zulu, 633 Squadron, to name but a few.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Lisa Louise James
For France it was downhill the second they became free again.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Saidin6Reply toLisa Louise James
Too funny
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Reggie Kettle
If today's young men had been born back then they too would have done their duty - no doubt !
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Coyolito
Great photos, let the world remember who has always been the beacon of freedom and good for the last 150 years... America. God bless America
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Nursechick66Reply toCoyolito
A...not the
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Obi WhippetReply toCoyolito
I'm not anti-American, but that really is a delusion. Ask the countries that have been bombed, subverted, had their presidents assassinated, etc etc.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
null
The British were there too!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
SteveO39Reply tonull
Everyone and their dog is their now.. why did we bother?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
greg
And are the French grateful for freeing them?
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
Hugh MonReply togreg
We did owe the Froggies a bit for helping us throw out the Redcoats... and then for selling us a fifth of the continent for dirt cheap.
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]
MelvillReply togreg
Non!
[ 0 ] [ 0 ]

评论

游客 请登录 注册